I read it as "This World Does Not Exist", which would be a fantastic NFT collection.
the .com domain looks like it was registered a few hours ago Hope that was you!
This word does not exist
401–410 of 432 posts
Re: This word does not exist
#402Googler: https://www.thisworddoesnotexist.com/w/googler/eyJ3IjogImdvb...
It's also already taken as a startup name!
Re: This word does not exist
#403Googler: https://www.thisworddoesnotexist.com/w/googler/eyJ3IjogImdvb...
Hah, I just noticed that the url has base64 json in it. Is there a name for this pattern? `{"w": "googler", "d": "an idle person", "p": "noun", "e": "my googlers runnin' over the kitchen sink"}`
Re: This word does not exist
#404Re: This word does not exist
#405Author here! Funny to see this at the top of HN today -- happy to answer any questions (source code is here https://github.com/turtlesoupy/this-word-does-not-exist ) Shameless plug for my other "this x does not exist": This Fucked Up Homer Does Not Exist https://www.thisfuckeduphomerdoesnotexist.com/
I think what it does with real words is almost more interesting. The definition it picked for the word "real" was accurate, but kind of odd. If I recall correctly, "real" was defined as, "committed", or "dedicated", as in "real fans only like the vinyl edition of that record." Which is like, true for sure, but not in the top 10 things I'd think of first.
Re: This word does not exist
#406Re: This word does not exist
#407The word I got was "flink", which actually does exist, in German, it means 'nimble'.
Re: This word does not exist
#408Author here! Funny to see this at the top of HN today -- happy to answer any questions (source code is here https://github.com/turtlesoupy/this-word-does-not-exist ) Shameless plug for my other "this x does not exist": This Fucked Up Homer Does Not Exist https://www.thisfuckeduphomerdoesnotexist.com/
Re: This word does not exist
#409I played with this and it is super interesting (almost made me register a couple domain names!) That said, to me, it once again reinforces the belief that a large factor in GPT-3 amazingness is the taste in prompting/filtering that humans apply to it, that is, it produces a ton of crap that does not catch our eye that we just silently ignore and discard, but we will amplify and share amongst ourselves the output that…
Computers aren't creative; the excitement about GPT-3 is humans projecting something into its output or filtering the small number of bits that appear to make sense, as you say. Neural language models are just recycling bits that humans have said before, they address well the "how to say" part of NLG (Natural Language Generation) but fail with respect to the "what to say" part.