Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Container for Firefox

mozilla.org

401–410 of 446 posts

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#401
post #66

I use the 'Containerise' plugin along with the following configuration (which I am constantly tweaking) to keep the big tech companies isolated from each other and the rest of the web. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/containerise/ I'm also increasingly using it to keep their various properties isolated from each other (eg. keeping Bing separate from the rest of Microsoft) to reduce tracking even furthe…

Oh wow. I used containers for a while, but the official plugin for managing them was awful. You had to go to the site, set the container, then click an approve button the _next_ time you went to it. Took forever to get things set up, and it never synced the settings despite claiming it would. I'm going to give this one a try. Thanks!

I was quite frustrated by this as well, but then I remembered that the design goal of the extension is allowing logging into the same service with multiple accounts, not isolating services from each other. That is why the secondary functionality, the possibility of isolating tech fiefdoms, is less polished. It's not the main show, it's just a happy side effect.

Containerise and Cookie Autodelete together are indeed a very good addition to uBlock and uMatrix, and if you already have some Regular Expression classification rules written for Cookie Autodelete, setting up Containerise is very quick. It works like a charm even with the Firefox Multi Account Containers extension itself disabled.

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#402

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you, I'll look in to this!

Be careful doing this though, there's a reason Tor Browser exists and it is because it's very hard to do anonimity over Tor right on a default browser. Granted, Tor tries to upstream as much as it reasonably can to FF, but there's still large differences in defaults that could give away (some bits of) your identity.

See this comment first, not mine but might as well be https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24853678

It's all baby steps. I don't expect to be fully anonymous this way, just like I know my current setup does not foil more sophisticated tracking.

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#403

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also adding to this - you can set up container-specific proxies with "Container proxy" addon. This is great for when you want to ensure your connection is going over a private network, for instance if you have a regular torrent website (or porn or whatever) - you can configure it to automatically open in a container, like this Facebook addon - but when it opens - it will only connect to the endpoint over a proxy. If…

I just discovered Mullvad (just a VPN provider) and for some reason, they don't have "English" in the list of languages available for their site. So they redirected me to the Dutch version because I'm in a nominally Dutch-speaking region, and I had no option to get it in English. I had to go with half-translated French until I noticed that I could replace the "fr" in the URL with "en", and actually get to an English-…

Just checked it, and English is 4th option in the language switcher on the bottom of the page.

Also, it seems to be using browser's preferred locale, not the IP region. So, it looks like that changed, too.

Google, on the other hand, is just as bad as you described. Geo-based localisation, lots of clicks to change the language (or ?hl=en, once you learn about it).

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#405
post #343

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does FF send DNS requests via the proxy? Depending on the personal threat model and the ISP, that might matter.

FF defaults to DNS-over-HTTPS now, so I would imagine it does, although I can't find solid confirmation.

Only in the US.

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#406
post #343

Earlier quoted context omitted.

tor provides a socks proxy, which you can assign to a container easy enough w/ the container proxy addon.

Does FF send DNS requests via the proxy? Depending on the personal threat model and the ISP, that might matter.

There are checkboxes to control this in the Firefox proxy settings. "Proxy DNS when using SOCKS v5" and "Enable DNS over HTTPS".

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#409

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use the same setup (mullvad + container proxy) and can't praise it enough. I just keep a mullvad connection open on my router and only route the proxy IPs through it. Great for all kinds of silly GeoIP restrictions, too - in my part of the world, homedepot.com just spits out "access denied", a foodnetwork.com recipe you find in search results just redirects you to the tudiscovery.com homepage, etc.

>"I just keep a mullvad connection open on my router and only route the proxy IPs through it.' I'm interested in your setup. Do you configure your router to have a point to point tunnel with Mullvad then? I didn't know this was a thing. Do you then just have a separate container proxy for each GeoIP region you want to access?

I have a Unifi USG, which has a third party wireguard addon, though of course OpenWRT could work just fine. You setup a wireguard tunnel normally, but disable the default routing (on a Unifi, set route-allowed-ip false), and then explicitly add a route for 10.124.0.0/16 through the wireguard interface. The mullvad servers page[1] has socks 5 proxy addresses for all of their servers - assign one to a firefox container and you're all set. No reason you couldn't have a container for each geographic region you want.

1. https://mullvad.net/en/servers/

On a USG the config looks like this:

    wireguard wg0 {
        address ***/32
        mtu 1420
        peer *** {
            allowed-ips 0.0.0.0/0
            endpoint ***:51820
        }
        private-key ***
        route-allowed-ips false
        up-command "ip route add 10.64.0.1/32 dev wg0 && ip route add 10.124.0.0/16 dev wg0"
    }

Re: Facebook Container for Firefox

#410

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just discovered Mullvad (just a VPN provider) and for some reason, they don't have "English" in the list of languages available for their site. So they redirected me to the Dutch version because I'm in a nominally Dutch-speaking region, and I had no option to get it in English. I had to go with half-translated French until I noticed that I could replace the "fr" in the URL with "en", and actually get to an English-…

Just checked it, and English is 4th option in the language switcher on the bottom of the page. Also, it seems to be using browser's preferred locale, not the IP region. So, it looks like that changed, too. Google, on the other hand, is just as bad as you described. Geo-based localisation, lots of clicks to change the language (or ?hl=en, once you learn about it).

Looks like you're right, but unfortunately the select is cut for me[0] because my screen is not big enough.

Since the list is not alphabetically ordered (it actually is, but with the English names, not the displayed names) and it shows no scrollbar, it wasn't obvious there would be other countries up there.

As for language, maybe Google itself chose to send me to the Dutch version. Despite all my attempts, I still cannot consistently get Google to use the language I want (apart from manually choosing it by directly visiting Google with the right hl= first, indeed). Right now Google.fr seems to be in English and offering me the three languages of Belgium, for some reason.

[0]https://i.imgur.com/nuAPsxD.png

Post reply on HN