Earlier quoted context omitted.
> does not do your case any favors I'm not making a case. I'm describing the state of the reddit culture. Whether you believe it or not, is incidental. > The site owners don't ban users based on race and gender which is the claim I responded to. Your statements were broader than that. Revisionism aside, you can get banned for voting on a post, and there are lots of rules (written and unwritten by each community) that…
> I'm not making a case. That much is clear. > I'm describing the state of the reddit culture. Whether you believe it or not, is incidental. Very convincing. Oh, I know, you don't care about that in the least. > Your statements were broader than that. Revisionism aside... No, they weren't. You stated that the subreddits are ultimately controlled by the site owners, and I explained that the site owners don't ban peopl…
Not cherry picking to make an observation that documents the history. Its an ongoing, and well covered, topic for which you can demonstrably research without difficulty. Denial doesnt help either of us and causes me to question your sincerity. Good luck with whatever.