Live data from Hacker News

Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

namepros.com

401–410 of 435 posts

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#401

I use also use ddg, but maps.google is far better for maps. So I mix both, using an addon, I can right click an address and send to google maps. Its a nice compromise.

Maybe Apple can give serious competition to google maps hopefully soon and DDG can partner with it.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#405

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Disclaimer: The following is based on my memories of working at Corel at the time. My memory is crap, so it is possible I've made mistakes. Please verify the authenticity of my claims if it is important to you and don't take my word for it. At almost the exact same time, MS bought Corel Stock that enabled Corel to stay afloat. It was non-voting stock, but it had a veto on acquisitions (to reasonably protect their inv…

I don't follow the scheme here. What are "penalties on the acquisition deals"? This all seems rather roundabout when it's dependent on the company being close to insolvency anyway, so they could have just bought them outright to begin with if that was really their master plan.

I'm guessing Corel was in the middle of an acquisition that had a back out penalty. If the acquisition was vetoed, the back out penalty would have bankrupted Corel. Sounds like blackmail to me.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#406
post #281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same syllables sure but there has to be a hard stop between the two syllables since b and s can’t be strung together.

The two words can be strung together just fine in English. Think of the word "rub", then "rubs", then "rubs search", then "rubsearch". The final 'b' in "web" is indeed pronounced differently when linked to the word "search". For more discussion see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_change https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assimilation_(phonology) Page 10 of http://www.ling.hawaii.edu/faculty/donegan/Papers/201Xhistph.…

It is not normal English for a "b" at the end of a word to get assimilated into the "s" at the start of the word.

(Note also that when you say "rubs", the "b" is not getting assimilated - it's the "s" that is getting assimilated into a voiced "z")

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#407
post #9

DDG is great - have been using it for months and I really enjoy the results. Google searches seem to be more of an echo chamber whereas DDG results seem to be more representative across a broad spectrum of sites.

There are no DDG results: DDG serves Bing results. What you are really saying is that you prefer Bing to Google results.

No they aren't. DuckDuckGo does add some of their own stuff in there. Ending up with different results. You can verify.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#408
post #287

According to wikipedia, On2 Technologies, formerly known as The Duck Corporation... So it all makes sense now and all the conspiracy theories about Google's ownership proven false. And kudos to Google for transferring a high value domain ownership out to a competitor!

I mean, this was known all along for anyone willing to take 30s to research it. Sadly, these days, people just love jumping to conclusion and assuming the worst possible explanation. Hell, even when Google goes out of their way to do the right thing, the top comment here is still conspiracy saying they did it out of greed. There's no winning here.

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#409

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Heh. That works really well in English. (Wondered if I could use this in Dutch too, but decided against it due to the seminal connotations of ‘kwak’…)

You'd likely be able to recognize DuckDuckGo users by their black eyes.

I would say red eyes instead because of sleepless nights spent tweaking their Linux installation ;)

Re: Google transferred ownership of Duck.com to DuckDuckGo

#410
post #10

No mention of a sale? That seems so strange. I cant think of any other times that a business has given charity to a direct competitor like this.

It's more reminiscent of Batman giving one of his batrangs to a kid dressed like him.

:-)
Post reply on HN