Live data from Hacker News

A Tube map of the London Underground that's more useful than the 'official' one

independent.co.uk

41–47 of 47 posts

Re: A Tube map of the London Underground that's more useful than the 'official' one

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With the Northern Line being split, though, it isn't clear that I can take a single train from High Barnet to Charing Cross, or from Edgware to Bank.

Yes splitting the Northern line like that is not at all helpful; there was a plan a few years back to smooth the flow by making all Edgeware trains go via Bank and High Barnet via Charing Cross (or vice-versa, I forget), but it seems to have withered on the vine.

As far as I am aware TfL still desperately wants to do this -- the Northern line is one of the busiest on the system and the switching south of Camden Town is a chokepoint.

The problem is that if that were done today, Camden Town would instantly become a major interchange station. It's a small, crowded station and in no way could cope with the added load.

Ten years ago there was a plan to rebuild it a massive new station along a whole block of the high street, but it had too much opposition. The last I heard is that they are going forward with a plan that's less disruptive at street-level. No construction has started yet, so check back in a decade.

Re: A Tube map of the London Underground that's more useful than the 'official' one

#42
It's definitely interesting to recolour the Overground now that there are so many parts – though I hear rumours it's coming at some point, probably around Crossrail time. And geographic information is occasionally useful.

I don't really agree that the map as a whole is "more useful", however! It's much less clear that the current Tube map, for example, which has had quite a bit of attention paid to visual clarity.

It's always nice to see re-interpretations though. My favourite is probably the concentric circular layout: https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/london_undergro...

Re: A Tube map of the London Underground that's more useful than the 'official' one

#43
post #10

"more useful" That is certainly up debate. The reason why the diagrammatic layout was (and is) highly praised by the public is because of its readibility. People only look at 2 locations: their current one and their destination. They will eventually look at possible routes and keep track of a couple of intersections. But everything in between remains unnoticed. It's like believing that users look at every pixel of yo…

"Wait, why is the tube turning North? We're supposed to go East!". This is actually very irritating for inexperienced tube users. For example, the Piccadilly line is often signed as running Westbound and Eastbound, but a significant part of it runs North-South, according to all the maps, and compared to the Victoria Line which is indeed signed Northbound and Southbound. Then Euston-Kings Cross is Northbound on one li…

I concur -- travelling in Boston can be frustrating for those who are inexperienced. They use 'inbound' and 'outbound', but without knowledge of the centre point for that line this information is useless!

Re: A Tube map of the London Underground that's more useful than the 'official' one

#44
While not very useful for planning to get around, this map shows all of the lines, junctions and platforms of the tube and National Rail in London, along with the dates the lines were constructed.

http://carto.metro.free.fr/cartes/metro-tram-london/

Re: A Tube map of the London Underground that's more useful than the 'official' one

#45
I'd be interested in a variant that uses travel time for the length of edges, and time to reach street level for the diameter of vertices. Bonus points if these were to reflect current conditions such as delays caused by "passenger action".

Re: A Tube map of the London Underground that's more useful than the 'official' one

#46
post #39
post #36

This map just showed me that I can actually have a better route to my daily commute, I've moved to London three weeks ago didn't notice. The London Planner APP never shown me that route because of some default setting! Will test it tomorrow. It's from Streatham Common to London Fields, never thought about going to Victoria and then to Moorgate through Circle Line. Was usually getting the northern line in Balham... bi…

This is useful citymapper.com/london

Still worse than Öffi https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.... in terms of coverage – 3 cities in Germany? Really Citymapper?

Re: A Tube map of the London Underground that's more useful than the 'official' one

#47
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Wait, why is the tube turning North? We're supposed to go East!". This is actually very irritating for inexperienced tube users. For example, the Piccadilly line is often signed as running Westbound and Eastbound, but a significant part of it runs North-South, according to all the maps, and compared to the Victoria Line which is indeed signed Northbound and Southbound. Then Euston-Kings Cross is Northbound on one li…

I concur -- travelling in Boston can be frustrating for those who are inexperienced. They use 'inbound' and 'outbound', but without knowledge of the centre point for that line this information is useless!

> They use 'inbound' and 'outbound', but without knowledge of the centre point for that line this information is useless!

Especially since that changes once you cross the center—you can go "inbound" to your destination, and then "inbound" to go home.

Post reply on HN