Live data from Hacker News

Google Dictionary

google.com

41–50 of 72 posts

Re: Google Dictionary

#41
post #2

I've always typed "define: ", but this seems to be superior.

It would be nice if there were a way to get straight to it from a regular search though. It is still more convenient for me (in Firefox) to hit Command+k and type "define:".

Also, it'd be nice if Google could just read my mind instead of me having to laboriously type in search queries.

Re: Google Dictionary

#42
post #37

It's great that they used definitions from the Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's English Dictionary ( http://www.antimoon.com/how/cobuild-review.htm ). Collins was the pioneer of corpus-based full-sentence definitions back in the 90s. Nowadays, there are better choices for an English learner (e.g. the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English), but COBUILD is still miles ahead of open projects like Wiktionary. Over…

On the off chance, does anyone have recommendations for similar resources in German, French, and/or Spanish?

For translations to/from German from/to (English, Spanish, etc), dict.leo.org is pretty decent. Not sure that's what you're looking for.

Re: Google Dictionary

#43
post #37

It's great that they used definitions from the Collins COBUILD Advanced Learner's English Dictionary ( http://www.antimoon.com/how/cobuild-review.htm ). Collins was the pioneer of corpus-based full-sentence definitions back in the 90s. Nowadays, there are better choices for an English learner (e.g. the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English), but COBUILD is still miles ahead of open projects like Wiktionary. Over…

On the off chance, does anyone have recommendations for similar resources in German, French, and/or Spanish?

Why not http://translate.google.com/

Re: Google Dictionary

#44
post #18

Good dictionaries are hand-compiled by experienced lexicographers. Not Google's strength, to put it mildly. What Google would be extremely good at is creating corpora for all these languages. An example of an excellent Spanish corpus is the following: http://www.corpusdelespanol.org/x.asp

Good encyclopedias are compiled by experienced... oh wait.

No idea if this specific effort is any good, but Google have done a lot of interesting things with language already.

Re: Google Dictionary

#45
post #41
post #2

I've always typed "define: ", but this seems to be superior.

It would be nice if there were a way to get straight to it from a regular search though. It is still more convenient for me (in Firefox) to hit Command+k and type "define:". Also, it'd be nice if Google could just read my mind instead of me having to laboriously type in search queries.

To add any search to the search bar in Firefox:

- install addon Add to Search Bar

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3682

Then right click in the search page's search field and choose "Add to search bar ..."

Re: Google Dictionary

#46
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would be nice if there were a way to get straight to it from a regular search though. It is still more convenient for me (in Firefox) to hit Command+k and type "define:". Also, it'd be nice if Google could just read my mind instead of me having to laboriously type in search queries.

To add any search to the search bar in Firefox: - install addon Add to Search Bar https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3682 Then right click in the search page's search field and choose "Add to search bar ..."

Actually, I already know about that. What I wanted you to tell me (because I was too lazy to find it out for myself) was that I can change the search engine used via the Command+Up/Down keys.

Still, those arrow keys are all the way down there and I can type "define:" pretty fast...

Re: Google Dictionary

#47
post #41
post #2

I've always typed "define: ", but this seems to be superior.

It would be nice if there were a way to get straight to it from a regular search though. It is still more convenient for me (in Firefox) to hit Command+k and type "define:". Also, it'd be nice if Google could just read my mind instead of me having to laboriously type in search queries.

This looks similar to the define: results, but juiced up on steroids. Maybe at some point this will be what you get when you do a define: search?

Re: Google Dictionary

#48
post #4

I'm liking the interface, they even include IPA transcriptions! I bet this will get most online and many offline dictionaries out of business.

they even include IPA transcriptions

This is very good, as it will promote learning the International Phonetic Alphabet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Phonetic_Alphabet

Post reply on HN