Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is likely above the 95th percentile writing skills for neurotypical twelve-year-olds, and uses anachronistic language to boot. When's the last time you heard a twelve-year-olds using words like "I am weary", or" for causing so much hardship.", or idiomatic abstracts like "another way of being". If you took a neurotypical kid and duct-taped their mouth shut up to age 12, you would be robbing them of the vast majo…
Take this passage from the blog and consider the tone and language, and ask yourself whether it could come from a twelve year old, much less an autistic twelve year old who'd only been communicating for three years, and presumably had never done things like read novels for fun (which I consider central to my own language skills relative to my peers): "I love to flap my hands. I flap to feel my body in space. No one g…
If all you knew about him was that he's 5 years old, autistic, and still hasn't figured out the toilet, you might be skeptical of the above paragraph. You'd be prone to evaluate my son based on something other than his actual capabilities.
One thing I've observed with him is that he tends to go from zero to awesome almost overnight. We had the hardest time getting him to speak, and then at around age 2 and a half he ballooned from a 10 word vocabulary to 250+ words in just over a month, and then quickly to complete sentences that were atypically advanced for his age. This sort of thing is normal for at least some subset of the autistic.
Could this have come from an "autistic twelve year old who'd only been communicating for three years"? Absolutely -- if he began communicating, and then obsessed about it the way my son obsesses about numbers. Sure, there's reason to be skeptical regarding the methodology described in one of the comments, but "this could not possibly be a child communicating" is going too far in the skeptical direction.