They have an Android version as well, but I have not used it.
TextNut – a WYSIWYG markdown editor for Mac
41–47 of 47 posts
Re: TextNut – a WYSIWYG markdown editor for Mac
#42TextNut looks like it will combine the two (organization and editing) but I will wait until it has flatfile compatibility.
Re: TextNut – a WYSIWYG markdown editor for Mac
#43So while this is common trend I really wish developers would stop using the "Download on the Mac App Store" graphic when it should be "Buy on the Mac App Store". Also there is NO MENTION of the price or even the fact this is not free (other than linking to trial which implies that). I really hate this practice of baiting and switching.
Blame it on Apple, they mandate using this button. I understand why they don't want to use prices, because those are localized, but agree that it should differentiate free vs. paid apps.
Re: TextNut – a WYSIWYG markdown editor for Mac
#44Re: TextNut – a WYSIWYG markdown editor for Mac
#45Why are pretty markdown editors such a thing on Mac specifically? Is that the favored platform for bloggers, or something?
That's been generally how things are on OS X for years (even before the Mac App Store). Small companies like Panic (much smaller originally) have found out that people are willing to pay for quality tools.
Re: TextNut – a WYSIWYG markdown editor for Mac
#46I find the "100% Compatible with CommonMark" a bit confusing, without looking I'd assume CommonMark was another product from the same people, and they'd done a re-branding, and wanted to make the association. That said, whilst writing this comment it occurs to me that CommonMark might also be an effort I've never heard of to standardise out some of John Gruber’s original undefined spec behaviours, but as a developer…
You're right that it was an effort to pin down the markdown spec by not-Gruber people. And Github actually was involved, along with some other big names like Reddit, Stackexchange, and Meteor.
Re: TextNut – a WYSIWYG markdown editor for Mac
#47For programming, I use Adobe's Source Code Pro.
However, for writing non-code, what do you recommend?
I'm currently trying Adobe's Source Serif Pro, which isn't bad. There's also Source Sans Pro, but I would have thought a serif font would be better for non-code tasks, and more pleasing on the eyes.
Other recommendations?