8 Considerations on Choosing a Programming Language

Post by kluck » Wed, Apr 08, 2015, 9:37 AM UTC

m0skit0 wrote: post #40

kluck wrote: post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its a fact: Using a dynamically typed language you have to write more code (tests etc.) to achieve the situation where you catch the same kind of bugs that a statically typed language would inform you during analysis. Strong and weak typing is a different thing. And I agree, it is not that simple, but only if you take other factors into account.

Why wouldn't you take other factors into account? Or better, why would you take this factor in particular as the only factor that matters?

Post by justthistime_ » Mon, Apr 20, 2015, 9:28 PM UTC

m0skit0 wrote: post #42

kluck wrote: post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For me that is the most important factor, because it directly influences the amount of code produced. Less code means less bugs and less code to read/understand when getting back into a codebase.

Then I guess you chose the wrong side. Dynamically-typed languages produce less code precisely because you don't need to specify the types. E.g. Scala is more verbose than Clojure.