Live data from Hacker News

Welcome Peter

blog.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 161 posts

Re: Welcome Peter

#41

Peter Thiel is a political extremist, and I don't like a lot of his views at all. My point of view is that this is bad for YCombinator, and that this is a bit of a shame.

"Political extremist" is an empty ad-hominem --- please point out specifically what views of his are so distasteful.

Probably his libertarian views.

Re: Welcome Peter

#42
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this is not true. an accelerator can do earlier (before team or product or idea); wider (fund literally anyone who can write five pages in English in a timed setting about their idea); lower (take 0.075% for $2k); faster (an SaaS app that wires you a check within 24 hours, after a human lawyer verifies your details and contract); riskier (billion dollar ideas that don't even have the research paper worked out - like…

All those are valid. One you forgot: YC, like nearly all other accelerators, is implicitly age-ist. Note that I said implicitly. There is no explicit age discrimination that I am aware of, but the entire program is structured in a way that makes it horribly impractical for anyone who isn't a bachelor/bachelorette and childless. You must move to the Bay Area, put in family-unfriendly hours, and live on a quantity of m…

I think one reason you don't see a lot of older folks applying to YC is not necessarily for this reason. The most talented older people, the ones who would be getting into YC anyway, presumably have been in the industry for 20 years. When you've been around that long, you tend to already have plenty of connections. You're already tapped into the silicon valley network. So why bother going the route of YC if you can already secure meetings with investors without them?

Re: Welcome Peter

#43
post #35

"the founders of those companies will generally tell you he has been their best source" Honest question: if a company receives investment from Peter Thiel, do the founders have any choice but to express the opinion above?

Yes, especially if it's in candid conversation instead of a TechCrunch article.

Re: Welcome Peter

#44

Peter Thiel is a political extremist, and I don't like a lot of his views at all. My point of view is that this is bad for YCombinator, and that this is a bit of a shame.

"Political extremist" is an empty ad-hominem --- please point out specifically what views of his are so distasteful.

“Most importantly, I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”

"Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron."

Re: Welcome Peter

#45
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this is not true. an accelerator can do earlier (before team or product or idea); wider (fund literally anyone who can write five pages in English in a timed setting about their idea); lower (take 0.075% for $2k); faster (an SaaS app that wires you a check within 24 hours, after a human lawyer verifies your details and contract); riskier (billion dollar ideas that don't even have the research paper worked out - like…

All those are valid. One you forgot: YC, like nearly all other accelerators, is implicitly age-ist. Note that I said implicitly. There is no explicit age discrimination that I am aware of, but the entire program is structured in a way that makes it horribly impractical for anyone who isn't a bachelor/bachelorette and childless. You must move to the Bay Area, put in family-unfriendly hours, and live on a quantity of m…

YC is explicitly oriented toward circumstances which have the highest potential to yield huge upside, and will naturally fund companies that fall into those trends. It seems prima facie obvious that they would not deliberately avoid investing in a group that was likely to outperform.

Who knows? Maybe it's the case that people who put in family-unfriendly hours and live on impossibly low amounts of money are those most likely to survive the rollercoaster of a venture backed startup. On balance, younger founders who have low personal burn / high free time may be better suited to the lifestyle demands.

I'm saying this as a 28 year old, married, solo founder with kids, so this is clearly not always true. However, distributed across 1000's of YC founders and hundreds of startups it's hardly surprising to find a lower age trend.

Re: Welcome Peter

#47
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this is not true. an accelerator can do earlier (before team or product or idea); wider (fund literally anyone who can write five pages in English in a timed setting about their idea); lower (take 0.075% for $2k); faster (an SaaS app that wires you a check within 24 hours, after a human lawyer verifies your details and contract); riskier (billion dollar ideas that don't even have the research paper worked out - like…

All those are valid. One you forgot: YC, like nearly all other accelerators, is implicitly age-ist. Note that I said implicitly. There is no explicit age discrimination that I am aware of, but the entire program is structured in a way that makes it horribly impractical for anyone who isn't a bachelor/bachelorette and childless. You must move to the Bay Area, put in family-unfriendly hours, and live on a quantity of m…

Literally everything is harder with young children. Not just YC. That doesn't mean the world is ageist. That means that parenting is hard work that comes at the expense of your other priorities.

Re: Welcome Peter

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Political extremist" is an empty ad-hominem --- please point out specifically what views of his are so distasteful.

“Most importantly, I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.” "Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron."

Those sound pretty damning to me. Especially coming from a billionaire.

Re: Welcome Peter

#49
I can't help but think how this reflects on YC's previous words in regard to diversity in the tech industry. The obvious snark involves the word "myth" or expanding YC's diversity to include people on record as opposing it, but my intent is not to express snark. No surprise when money trumps the need for explanation. I guess being a billionaire means never having to say you're sorry.

Good luck.

Re: Welcome Peter

#50
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All those are valid. One you forgot: YC, like nearly all other accelerators, is implicitly age-ist. Note that I said implicitly. There is no explicit age discrimination that I am aware of, but the entire program is structured in a way that makes it horribly impractical for anyone who isn't a bachelor/bachelorette and childless. You must move to the Bay Area, put in family-unfriendly hours, and live on a quantity of m…

I think one reason you don't see a lot of older folks applying to YC is not necessarily for this reason. The most talented older people, the ones who would be getting into YC anyway, presumably have been in the industry for 20 years. When you've been around that long, you tend to already have plenty of connections. You're already tapped into the silicon valley network. So why bother going the route of YC if you can a…

That's an interesting and I think valid point. Older people tend to find it easier to raise money just on their own, make connections on their own, etc. They also have more experience, so they need less mentoring.

Maybe they just don't need accelerators as much, therefore there's no niche for one that caters to that crowd.

Post reply on HN