Live data from Hacker News

"Ayn Rand's Revenge" - NYTimes Book Review of new Rand biography

nytimes.com

41–42 of 42 posts

Re: "Ayn Rand's Revenge" - NYTimes Book Review of new Rand biography

#41
post #37
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're going to criticize the book, at least consider the time in which it was written, don't just say "it was bad and tedious and I couldn't get through it". Atlas Shrugged was written in the 40s and 50s as a response to Communism, which was the new cool philosophy at the time. Objectivism and laissez-faire capitalism certainly have their flaws, and they're the same as for any other philosophical solution-to-ever…

Yes exactly. It's a product of its time. Many people consider Asimov or Heinlein equally impenetrable. Hell, many people consider Joyce and Proust tedious. And I wouldn't be at all surprised in a few years if Atlas Shrugged is attacked for glorifying smoking and pollution too...

Publication date of 1984: 1949. Bad writing is bad writing.

Re: "Ayn Rand's Revenge" - NYTimes Book Review of new Rand biography

#42
post #4

"But Cerf offered Rand an alternative: if she gave up 7 cents per copy in royalties, she could have the extra paper needed to print Galt’s oration. That she agreed is a sign of the great contradiction that haunts her writing and especially her life." On the contrary, actually. The idea of artistic integrity is a _very_ central point of her preceding novel, The Fountainhead. The book's main protagonist, Howard Roark,…

True, but the amount of money Rorck gave up was minuscule compared to the amount Hank Rearden gave up to keep Readen Metal as product rather than a scientific curiosity. Did the reviewer even read the book?
Post reply on HN