This is also very nice: http://www.dhteumeuleu.com/the-momentum-equation
Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment
41–50 of 61 posts
Re: Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment
#42IPhone 5s, ios 8: crashes the page, then forces a system reboot. :/
iPad 2 iOS 6, stable
Re: Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment
#43Re: Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment
#44Re: Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tell that to the boss
If you're the developer that's your job to tell that to your boss. Come up with analytics to support your findings, make your case, he's probably not going to be reading this thread and staying up to date on all the latest and greatest that's your job. He may be stubborn or you might find out that your user base is all IE6 I don't know but sitting around complaining isn't going to get you anywhere either :)
Come up with analytics to support your findings
Analytics are irrelevant when you're writing some huge internal service for a company whose conservative upgrade policy dictates that only one older browser will be installed and used company-wide until God-knows-when.
By the way, glancing at a few browser market share websites, it looks like IE8 and IE9 are alive and well, totaling around the same as IE11.
Re: Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment
#46So CSS can do 3D, but still not vertically center multiline text in a straightforward way?
Aren't you comparing the capability to do 3D with the straightforwardness of vertical centering, though? Certainly CSS has the capability to do vertical centering of multiline text, and I wouldn't call the 3D rendering strategy in this experiment amazingly straightforward---in fact, the cleverness of the technique is one of the things that makes this experiment so cool.
Re: Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Flexbox, or display: table-cell. These have been supported for a while now – you're not going to get old browser support, but they're not going to support 3D features either, so your complaint is either flame bait or ignorance.
> These have been supported for a while now For Safari still the -webkit prefix is required which is a bit odd
Webkit keeps prefixes usually because it is not implemented fully and it is an experimental feature. They began unprefixing flexbox in Sept. 2014, I don't know when it's gonna ship.
Though, its super unfair that the Web Inspector in Webkit uses unprefixed Flexbox (http://trac.webkit.org revision 173707).
Re: Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment
#48Re: Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment
#49This apparently seems authored by vasanthk 8 days ago (see github link). http://git.io/AY78
Re: Apparently transparent – CSS3D HTML5 Experiment
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tell that to the boss
If you're the developer that's your job to tell that to your boss. Come up with analytics to support your findings, make your case, he's probably not going to be reading this thread and staying up to date on all the latest and greatest that's your job. He may be stubborn or you might find out that your user base is all IE6 I don't know but sitting around complaining isn't going to get you anywhere either :)
Lol I am hardly "sitting around and complaining." At my last agency gig we had to support down to IE6 for several months until we built a strong case to only support down to IE8. Even still it was much harder and protracted battle than it should have been.