I bought and read the book a few months back. About half the book is about businesses (mainly large corporations), while the other half is about banking and the stock market. I think this disappointed readers who were expecting a directly applicable "how-to" book on business.
Here's a run-down of the book by chapter, with the chapters ostensibly related to business marked by asterisks:
1. The Fluctuation -- on stock market volatility
2. *The Fate of the Edsel* -- how Ford failed to find a product-market fit.
3. The Federal Income Tax -- self-explanatory.
4. A Reasonable Amount of Time -- on insider trader.
5. *Xerox Xerox Xerox Xerox* -- read this online.
6. Making the Customers Whole -- about how a large investment firm crumbled
when a single large speculative investment fell through, and how the
stock exchange stepped in to repay the firm's customers.
7. *The Impacted Philosophers* -- on an anti-trust investigation of General
Electric (perhaps Gates related personally to this).
8. The Last Great Corner -- about stock price manipulation
9. A Second Sort of Life -- about David Lilienthal, who went transitioned from
a career in government to investment banking.
10. *Stockholder Season* -- on what it's like, as an individual stockholder,
to attend a stockholder meeting.
11. *One Free Bite* -- on intellectual property and non-compete agreements.
12. In Defense of Sterling -- about how the central banks of the world
cooperate to maintain stability across currencies.
Many of these stories would be particularly relevant if you ran a multinational corporation or were one of the world's wealthiest investors. I think it's no accident that Bill Gates and Warren Buffet enjoyed this book so much.
I happened to enjoy the parts about Wall Street, so I enjoyed the book. The comparisons to Michael Lewis are apt. It was most interesting for me to see how many of the same economic issues being discussed today (income inequality, intellectual property, corporate misconduct, the extraordinary power and influence of the banking industry, etc.) were discussed in nearly the exact same terms 50+ years ago. It doesn't give you the sense that great progress has been made on these fronts, and perhaps we'll still be complaining about the exact same things in 2065.