Apple Mac Mini
41–50 of 134 posts
Re: Apple Mac Mini
#42I seriously do not understand how can it ship with a 500GB 5400rpm drive by default. This gives such poor experience to the user that Apple should have opted for all-ssd approach two generations ago. Very disappointed by that.
Agree - a 128gb ssd would have been better than that and cost roughly the same.
Re: Apple Mac Mini
#43I'm slightly bummed that I can't get SSD on their starting model, and have to force myself to a fusion drive if I want to do better than hard drive.
Really Apple. I was looking forward to new SSD minis for the parents, but 699+200 is a bit a much.
Re: Apple Mac Mini
#44Has the mini server gone away? I don't see it mentioned.
The model with two distinct disks looks gone now, though.
Re: Apple Mac Mini
#45Did I miss something, or does maxing out the CPU and the RAM on the mid-level model get you the same specs as a maxed-out high-end model for $200 cheaper?
Re: Apple Mac Mini
#46Did I miss something, or does maxing out the CPU and the RAM on the mid-level model get you the same specs as a maxed-out high-end model for $200 cheaper?
Re: Apple Mac Mini
#47I like the form-faktor and all, but really, with 900 bucks i am sticking to my custom ITX builds
Re: Apple Mac Mini
#48The $699 model + the SSD upgrade sums up to a whooping $899. I like the form-faktor and all, but really, with 900 bucks i am sticking to my custom ITX builds
Moreover, they dropped the expandable Mac Pro in favor of the new trashcan model which cannot be expanded -- except using thunderbolt which is just not as cheap as a drive bay.
That said, they're probably doing the right thing. The people who want the ITX build are hackers like us, and we just aren't that common.
Re: Apple Mac Mini
#49So correct me if I'm wrong, but they appear to have done the same thing with the Mac Mini to achieve the lower price point as they did with the iMac earlier this year, by introducing a 1.4Ghz i5 model? I don't recall the base Mac Mini being as weak before...
Wow, that's quite the downgrade. What's the logic here? To save energy to keep it fanless? Or is this cost-cutting?
Re: Apple Mac Mini
#50So correct me if I'm wrong, but they appear to have done the same thing with the Mac Mini to achieve the lower price point as they did with the iMac earlier this year, by introducing a 1.4Ghz i5 model? I don't recall the base Mac Mini being as weak before...
Correct. Yesterday a the entry Mac Mini was $599 and had a 2.5GHz dual-core i5 with 4GB of RAM.