Live data from Hacker News

The FLIR One, a heat camera for the iPhone, is now available

flir.com

41–50 of 61 posts

Re: The FLIR One, a heat camera for the iPhone, is now available

#43
post #34
post #17

Interesting. As a FLIR camera used to be expensive, I built my own thermal IR camera for $120 (2011): http://oi60.tinypic.com/2820yg2.jpg

Do you have a tutorial?

Probably a scanning IR thermometer. Not really the same thing...

Re: The FLIR One, a heat camera for the iPhone, is now available

#45

Is there something specific about the camera in the Iphone that would preclude doing a similar thing to android phones? Or is it just a matter of uniformity of the housing?

I believe I read somewhere that they are working on Android versions.

Re: The FLIR One, a heat camera for the iPhone, is now available

#47
post #46

Is there something specific about the camera in the Iphone that would preclude doing a similar thing to android phones? Or is it just a matter of uniformity of the housing?

Like this? http://therm-app.com/

$999 is a bit pricey I think.

You can buy a pro-sumer device for that money:

http://www.testequipmentdepot.com/flir/e-series/e4.htm

Re: The FLIR One, a heat camera for the iPhone, is now available

#48
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What am I seeing on the right below the LCD, is that the backlight driver?

I think it's the CPU's heatsink/fan. The warm cable on the left is a thunderbolt ethernet adaptor.

Oh a cable, of course. I thought I was looking at hot air blowing out from a vent on the side.

Re: The FLIR One, a heat camera for the iPhone, is now available

#49
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like this? http://therm-app.com/

$999 is a bit pricey I think. You can buy a pro-sumer device for that money: http://www.testequipmentdepot.com/flir/e-series/e4.htm

Well, the Opgal device has a resolution of 384 x 288 while the E4 lists 80x60. It's probably worth the asking price.

Re: The FLIR One, a heat camera for the iPhone, is now available

#50
post #30

Just a note on UX and visualization: Mapping temperature to a color/wavelength is not the perceptually best way to convey data. Humans are not good at estimating the distance between two data points when using a rainbow color scale. Using luminosity would be much better, or even a color scheme that uses saturation. See e.g. http://colorbrewer2.org/ . Different schemes are perceptually good to use depending on whether…

I had a chance to try out the flir one for a day. Pretty sweet but not perfect. It has a number of color scales prominently featured in the iPhone UI. Grayscale might match lumosity.

I used "contrast" to quickly identify hot / cold parts of my house, then "spot meter" to measure the actual temp. Found out part of my attic is not insulated. That's money going out through the roof.

Post reply on HN