Live data from Hacker News

Where KDE is Going – Part 1

dot.kde.org

41–50 of 72 posts

Re: Where KDE is Going – Part 1

#41
post #12

I have huge respect for everyone involved in KDE and OpenSource software and I'm writing this on KDE 4.13 but damn... it still sucks. Maybe I'm the wrong user.. but I do programming and do sysadmin stuff most of the time.. First the good parts: KDE is quite stable for me. I have hardly any crashes... this is huge as Unity had some ugly bugs I could not resolve. But I had to install the Numix theme and icons and tweak…

Can you share your Numix and KDE/GTK2/GTK3 tweaks?

Re: Where KDE is Going – Part 1

#42
post #12

I have huge respect for everyone involved in KDE and OpenSource software and I'm writing this on KDE 4.13 but damn... it still sucks. Maybe I'm the wrong user.. but I do programming and do sysadmin stuff most of the time.. First the good parts: KDE is quite stable for me. I have hardly any crashes... this is huge as Unity had some ugly bugs I could not resolve. But I had to install the Numix theme and icons and tweak…

Have you given lxqt or razor-qt a try? Both look quite promising for Qt and more streamlined.

Re: Where KDE is Going – Part 1

#43
post #19
post #15

It's got a lot of promise to be the best looking Linux desktop around. I don't really like the grey they use however; I'd lighten it up. But then you're in trouble of looking like iOS.

Have you seen elementaryOS? Everything they've come up with looks a million times more polished than anything else in the Linux world.

I always feel that Elementary OS is all looks, no substance. They replace many well-established applications with their own basic apps that might look better but lack functionality.

Re: Where KDE is Going – Part 1

#44
post #12

I have huge respect for everyone involved in KDE and OpenSource software and I'm writing this on KDE 4.13 but damn... it still sucks. Maybe I'm the wrong user.. but I do programming and do sysadmin stuff most of the time.. First the good parts: KDE is quite stable for me. I have hardly any crashes... this is huge as Unity had some ugly bugs I could not resolve. But I had to install the Numix theme and icons and tweak…

Running KDE on a dual core atom netbook with 2gb of ram (no ssd), and not experiencing any of the sluggishness you're talking about. In addition, I've added the kxstudio repositories, run a full JACK setup (considerable CPU overhead), and a digital audio workstation (ardour3) along with fl studio in a wine session. I plug in a second monitor, and I still have none of the problems you talk about. Granted, I'm only usi…

I did the switch from Gnome 2 to KDE 4 when I found that KDE 4 can run smooth with VESA driver on X11 and Gnome was running like a slug. Also, KDE have tendency to run with less problem when your X11 driver is buggy (AMD drivers...)

Re: Where KDE is Going – Part 1

#45
post #39
post #12

I have huge respect for everyone involved in KDE and OpenSource software and I'm writing this on KDE 4.13 but damn... it still sucks. Maybe I'm the wrong user.. but I do programming and do sysadmin stuff most of the time.. First the good parts: KDE is quite stable for me. I have hardly any crashes... this is huge as Unity had some ugly bugs I could not resolve. But I had to install the Numix theme and icons and tweak…

> Dolphin/Kwin/Konsole/Kate/Okular are really great tools, through and I enjoy using them more than the Gnome tools.. +1. This is why KDE has been my favourite desktop for 10 years. I don't do fancy stuff on my computer. I code. KDE gets the basic, essential tools right. Dolphin is better than Mac's Finder, Windows Explorer and Gnome's equivalent. And so is Konsole. I hope KDE keeps going strong.

Add KRunner, Yakuake and Okteta.

Re: Where KDE is Going – Part 1

#46
post #27

I feel like KDE5 is ugly, I'm already missing the detailed and elegant design of KDE4. Maybe it's just my whole dislike of the "minimalism" movement in general, but KDE5 looks dull and lifeless. That's just the visuals though. There's other great stuff about it to discuss, but I still can't help be disgusted by it's new look everytime I see it.

You know that you could change the widgets style and colours like on KDE 4 ? I don't dislike the new look&feel, but I like more what I have now (Oxygen with a dark colour scheme).

Re: Where KDE is Going – Part 1

#47

My experience with KDE was always that it was prettier than GNOME 2 (at that time) but a massive resource hog, so I always ended up uninstalling it. I am curious how KDE has come along in addressing the bloat issue.

GNOME2 is still more lightweight. Where KDE has gained popularity is with people bailing out from GNOME 3. FLTK still retains the small-and-fast crown.

False. KDE 4 runs far better that Gnome 2.

Re: Where KDE is Going – Part 1

#48
post #12

I have huge respect for everyone involved in KDE and OpenSource software and I'm writing this on KDE 4.13 but damn... it still sucks. Maybe I'm the wrong user.. but I do programming and do sysadmin stuff most of the time.. First the good parts: KDE is quite stable for me. I have hardly any crashes... this is huge as Unity had some ugly bugs I could not resolve. But I had to install the Numix theme and icons and tweak…

>With Numix the machine feels and looks great but I'm not so happy after installing Windows 8.1 on an 10 year old Pentium M notebook with 2GB RAM and having to realize that Windows is way faster and responsive and more feature-rich than KDE and Unity and requires less RAM. I'm not trolling - I'm talking about stuff like browsing files using the file manager and using a browser or office for writing documents.

Despite BS comments from some Linux zealots to the contrary, a Windows desktop was almost always snappier than Gnome/KDE official releases, especially after version 2 for Gnome and 3 for KDE.

Now, for the serverside things change drastically. It also changes drastically if you just use some mininal window manager on Linux.

But the whole "Windows is bloated/slow" etc was mostly uninformed boasts, for people who didn't use both on a day to day basis and took the whole "open source is by definition faster/less bloated/etc" line hook and sinker.

Re: Where KDE is Going – Part 1

#50
post #12

I have huge respect for everyone involved in KDE and OpenSource software and I'm writing this on KDE 4.13 but damn... it still sucks. Maybe I'm the wrong user.. but I do programming and do sysadmin stuff most of the time.. First the good parts: KDE is quite stable for me. I have hardly any crashes... this is huge as Unity had some ugly bugs I could not resolve. But I had to install the Numix theme and icons and tweak…

>Today, KDE is no longer a Unix Desktop Environment. Today, KDE is people: Us. You and me.

Compare this with:

>GNOME: People-focused[1]

Is it just me or is this focus on humans/people good at creating unpopular software?

[1] https://www.gnome.org/about/

Post reply on HN