Live data from Hacker News

Oculus CEO says selling to Facebook convinced big developers to build for it

techcrunch.com

41–46 of 46 posts

Re: Oculus CEO says selling to Facebook convinced big developers to build for it

#41
post #15
post #2

I was one of the people disappointed with the acquisition.. but to be honest as long as they put out a decent bit of kit and I actually get to experience VR the way they're demoing it I'll be one happy dude

I thought it was an early April Fool's joke. Cisco bought Flip for $590 million in 2009. By 2011 it was toast. While visionary for a moment, it wasn't perceptive enough to the impact of the smartphone. There is a case to be made that Oculus needs large amounts of capital to procure the manufacture of a huge volumes of headsets. Unless explicit guarantees were part of the sale, Facebook could allocate the capital to s…

Now there's talk of Carmack's previous employer alleging IP theft.

Hmmm... maybe that's why they scurried under the FB rock.

Re: Oculus CEO says selling to Facebook convinced big developers to build for it

#43
post #5
post #2

I was one of the people disappointed with the acquisition.. but to be honest as long as they put out a decent bit of kit and I actually get to experience VR the way they're demoing it I'll be one happy dude

Looking forward to the Facebook App Store launch. What do you think its name will be?

apps for facebox

Re: Oculus CEO says selling to Facebook convinced big developers to build for it

#44
post #5
post #2

I was one of the people disappointed with the acquisition.. but to be honest as long as they put out a decent bit of kit and I actually get to experience VR the way they're demoing it I'll be one happy dude

Looking forward to the Facebook App Store launch. What do you think its name will be?

Ad Hut.

Re: Oculus CEO says selling to Facebook convinced big developers to build for it

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Startups need to be profitable too.

I don't think that's true. Sustainability makes for a better ecosystem. If you're driving towards breaking even and delivering value instead of profitability then it's a different kind of mentality. It's just that it's not the current status quo.

How about the gross over-valuation of startup companies? $15 billion for an instant messaging application? $2 billion for a research company without a product? Both companies should have sold for, maybe a few hundred million, at most.

This is unsustainable in and of itself (and possibly irresponsible). Not to mention awful for the startup market (causing a startup valuation bubble).

Facebook obviously has to make money back from these purchases. Both purchases are technology companies, and therefore Facebook is likely in it short-term, meaning they hope to make their money back in How will they do it? Well, by doing what Facebook does best, selling your privacy.

Re: Oculus CEO says selling to Facebook convinced big developers to build for it

#46
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you give a couple of argumentative examples of their "public bad" actions? Maybe something else that dark design patters, which aren't exclusively limited to facebook. I'm honestly unfamiliar with their other nefarious behaviour, but I would love to know more about that.

I've talked about this before -- one of the reasons is how it helped in changing sharing culture w.r.t. privacy. One example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6530166

How is it Facebook's fault that your friends are posting pictures of you online?
Post reply on HN