Live data from Hacker News

The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

blog.linode.com

41–50 of 289 posts

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#42
post #33

I'm actually a little unhappy, it looks like they reduced the CPU count for my $20/mo instance. At this point there's basically no reason to stay with them now.

tl;dr: If you had 40 VMs on 8 cores before, you have 10 on 2 cores now. It is the same ratio of VMs:Cores but with stronger processors.

Long version: "If you take the upgrade, you inherit the new plan specs, vcpus and all.

We’ve greatly reduced the contention on these new machines compared to our old structure, and in testing this new arrangement provides much more consistent CPU time with less potential for steal. We think it’s great and totally worth the move, otherwise we wouldn’t have done it. These machines are incredibly fast, faster procs, SSDs, the network is incredible, etc."

From Caker's comment on the blog. It seems that this was done to reduce fighting over core and provided more consistent fair availability of processing power when they tested it b/t VMs.

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#43
post #15
post #5

It looks like Linode are still leaving the "incredibly cheap tiny box" market to DO. Linode's cheapest option is $20/month, which makes it slightly less useful for the kind of "so cheap you don't even think about it" boxes that DO provide.

> the "incredibly cheap tiny box" market How big is that market, really? I keep a small VPS around for whatever (I like Hetzner), and I'm sure lots of nerds are the same. But for any usage that's even a little bit serious, $20/month is peanuts.

I bet its a lot bigger than you think. For example, you can handle a ton of views on something like WordPress or Ghost with DO's smallest offering. Especially if you use it in combination with caching and and a reverse proxy like Cloudflare.

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#45
post #35
post #16

I notice that Linode talked a good bit about their bandwidth and included outbound bandwidth in their pricing model which DO does not. I wonder if DO has a similar model or if transfer capacity the only thing you have control over.

I do not understand the difference between outbound bandwidth vs the transfer. Can you explain a bit please?

Bandwidth - How big the pipe is.

Transfer - How much they let through the pipe.

Just a guess.

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#46
post #33

I'm actually a little unhappy, it looks like they reduced the CPU count for my $20/mo instance. At this point there's basically no reason to stay with them now.

This might be a good thing for some customers.

In the past on certain host servers you get a great experience - low latency and the ability to burst CPU usage. However occasionally you get provisioned on an awful server where the latency of your server varies significantly, and your apps struggle to get a decent share of the CPU.

I'd rather see my servers have a small but more fair amount of burst instead of all packages getting 8 CPUs with some of them getting a bad experience from noisy neighbours.

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use a tiny VPS provider that is actually $20/yr. For sites that get a couple thousand hits per month it is perfect. Although I do not see it as a requirement in this price range, the uptime has been on par with the big names (I have known of one 5 hour outage in the 3 years I have been using it). Even DO's $5/mo now seems a bit steep now for the "I just had a random idea" type thing.

Care to share the provider you are using?

There are always great offers on http://lowendbox.com/ - I'm very happy with the small KVM offers edis.at is offering.

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#48
Congratulation on Linode

I stopped being a customer since migrating to DO but my needs were really small

But I think their strategy of keeping the price and increasing capabilities are good. Between $5 and $20 is a "big" difference for one person (still, it's a day's lunch), for a company it's nothing.

However, I would definitely go to Linode for CPU/IO intensive tasks. Amazon sucks at these (more benchmarks between the providers are of course welcome)

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#49
post #34
post #5

It looks like Linode are still leaving the "incredibly cheap tiny box" market to DO. Linode's cheapest option is $20/month, which makes it slightly less useful for the kind of "so cheap you don't even think about it" boxes that DO provide.

One reason Linode doesn't offer "tiny boxes" is that they, like other companies, are worried about running out of IPv4 addresses.

This is not true.

Linode allow you to attach additional IPs to your Linode at $1/month, for example, I have one Linode which has 6 IPs attached for only $25/month. I still can't find a company has this kind of flexibility.

Re: The New Linode Cloud: SSDs, Double RAM and much more

#50
post #5

It looks like Linode are still leaving the "incredibly cheap tiny box" market to DO. Linode's cheapest option is $20/month, which makes it slightly less useful for the kind of "so cheap you don't even think about it" boxes that DO provide.

> Linode's cheapest option is $20/month, which makes it slightly less useful for the kind of "so cheap you don't even think about it" boxes that DO provide.

Yes, this, the $10 plan is DO's most popular.

Post reply on HN