Live data from Hacker News

Poll: The new HN comment system – agree, disagree, or wait and see?

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 157 posts

Re: Poll: The new HN comment system – agree, disagree, or wait and see?

#41
I read HN everyday and I value the commentary as much as the articles. This change has the potential to censor my contribution to that commentary.

So while I think there is a lot going for the idea, I think there will be a lot of good comments that won't ever be displayed so on balance I think HN will lose more than it gains.

Re: Poll: The new HN comment system – agree, disagree, or wait and see?

#42

It's worth comparing this poll to the one about whether HN should display comment scores: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2595605 Only 38.5% of users were in favor of comment scores being hidden, but it was decidedly a positive change for the site.

A few notes: 1) That poll was conducted well after the change. That makes it a very different type of poll. 2) This change has half as much support, if you ignore the wait-and-sees.

Why on earth would you ignore the "wait-and-sees"?

Re: Poll: The new HN comment system – agree, disagree, or wait and see?

#44
I disagreed, and am pretty happy with the openness of current HN system. I'd rather see some negative comments than missing out a few inspiring ones.

What I do find annoying is (as some have mentioned days/weeks ago)- the OP can delete his own post, even though there are many replies below. So now the other hackers have no idea what the rest of people are replying to.

Re: Poll: The new HN comment system – agree, disagree, or wait and see?

#45

It's worth comparing this poll to the one about whether HN should display comment scores: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2595605 Only 38.5% of users were in favor of comment scores being hidden, but it was decidedly a positive change for the site.

Prove that it was a positive change. If anything it's made parsing the comments harder IMO as the comment count provides extra context about how the community feels about the comment.

Re: Poll: The new HN comment system – agree, disagree, or wait and see?

#46
I'm not a big fan of the change. In theory there is nothing wrong with the new system, but I generally think HN has one of the best online communities around. Overall the average comment is polite, intelligent, and generally worth reading. So maybe I'm just not seeing the problem that it is trying to fix.

Re: Poll: The new HN comment system – agree, disagree, or wait and see?

#47
Call me cynical, but this sure seems like an effort to enforce groupthink on the company news outlet.

I suppose we'd do well to remember what business YC is in, and how critical public messaging and perception is to that business, not just in terms of their existing investments, but also ongoing recruitment.

Re: Poll: The new HN comment system – agree, disagree, or wait and see?

#48

It's worth comparing this poll to the one about whether HN should display comment scores: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2595605 Only 38.5% of users were in favor of comment scores being hidden, but it was decidedly a positive change for the site.

Is there a follow-up poll showing that it's "decidedly a positive change"? :-)

Re: Poll: The new HN comment system – agree, disagree, or wait and see?

#50

For note, here's a chart I just made of the number of Hacker News comments made over the last 3 years: http://i.imgur.com/4FwglA8.png The number of comments has been growing significantly; perhaps change won't be bad.

It'd be more useful if the graph was in terms of comments per story per month, I think. As it is, the data could just mean that stories hit the front page, get discussed, and disappear increasingly quickly.
Post reply on HN