Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A playground for extremely smart people Which is pretty much a definition of a good research lab.
I believe that the second clause in hendzen's reply is the point of the statement. > ... they don't want their competitors to hire. i.e. that the purpose is not to get them to do research for Google, but to stop them doing research or development for anyone else.
Why Google Doesn’t Have a Research Lab
41–43 of 43 posts
Re: Why Google Doesn’t Have a Research Lab
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can not say that is always true. Microsoft is a software engineering company as well, but they do have a dedicated R&D team and offices.
Who said it was always true? I certainly didn't. I made an assertion about Google, not Microsoft.
This sort of implied a generalization.
Re: Why Google Doesn’t Have a Research Lab
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
A playground for extremely smart people they don't want their competitors to hire.
X is still very much run by Sergey. On the more experimental projects (i.e. not Glass or self-driving cars) you have a fair amount of freedom to experiment, but if Sergey wants something to happen a certain way, it happens that way. (For that matter, the rest of the company isn't all that different: you have a fair amount of freedom to experiment, but if Larry wants something to happen a certain way, it happens that…