Live data from Hacker News

Scoble says Google Glass is doomed

plus.google.com

41–50 of 67 posts

Re: Scoble says Google Glass is doomed

#41
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

...which is its advantage. I doesn't take up your full viewing space, but puts the information right in front of you.

That's no advantage at all. A real AR HUD wouldn't need to 'take up your full viewing space' but could place information where it was relevant.

What I meant by that was that it doesn't put itself into your line of sight, but when you do want it, it is (very) easily accessible.

Re: Scoble says Google Glass is doomed

#42
(continuing his list)

11. You might as well carry a huge banner that says "I'm a giant nerd." You know how normal people start fidgeting and looking around for someone else to talk to the moment you mention that you work with computers? If you're wearing Google Glass, you won't even get to the hello.

Re: Scoble says Google Glass is doomed

#44
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think if someone can succeed at putting similar technology in normal looking glasses it will have a much better chance of success, otherwise I agree.

That would help, but I am not confident that it could be made as socially acceptable as for example smartphones. People who prioritize utility over fashion are prime candidates though. Even nerds who claim to be all about utility are typically more fashion conscious than they want to admit, but when you are on the job being all about utility stops being a fashion faux pas. Utility belts are perfectly acceptable for p…

Once upon a time if you had a pager you were probably a drug dealer, unless you were obviously a doctor. Social mores change, and so far they have trended towards accepting more and more invasive and distracting gadgets. I don't see any reason to think the line in the sand is here instead of the 10 other places people thought it might be up to now.

I also don't think it's a bad thing, mind you. We're heading into an age of mass surveillance whether we like it or not. If we're going there we may as well go there with defensive, personally controllable (even if not secure), devices to go with it. Who watches the watchers and all that.

Re: Scoble says Google Glass is doomed

#45
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's no advantage at all. A real AR HUD wouldn't need to 'take up your full viewing space' but could place information where it was relevant.

What I meant by that was that it doesn't put itself into your line of sight, but when you do want it, it is (very) easily accessible.

That's true, but it's not an advantage that it's not a true HUD, since a true HUD could place the information out of your line of sight or within it as appropriate, whereas Glass cannot.

Re: Scoble says Google Glass is doomed

#46
This is the problem people have with glass, they feel like their privacy is being invaded and it is not solving a painpoint. So google is going to know who i am looking at and what products i am looking at.... come on, this is ridiculous! I need to feel that this is a utility not something of excess i do not need. This can help doctors as info on pubmed quickly, collaborate with other docters quicker especially in urgent care. But telling that it is going to know who and what i am looking at, my intoxication etc, just does not make me want it. Imagine if Jobs marketed iphone as a way to take creepshots of females or the supposition of anything like that.

6. The really scary thing? The eye sensor. There's a reason why +Larry Page didn't answer my question at last year's Google IO: that thing can probably tell whether you are drunk or sober (think about THAT tonight). It also can probably tell you when you are checking out someone you shouldn't be (wait until the wife gets an alert about THAT). Of course Google will use it to tell what brands you are checking out at the grocery store (coupon alert) or when you are shopping in a shopping mall.

Re: Scoble says Google Glass is doomed

#47
post #4

My bet is on Google Glass going the way of the Segway... ...that is to say, ridiculed by the general public, but finding a bit of a niche in certain industries. The police, postal carriers, etc. @cstross did a pretty good job of convincing me that some form of augmented reality would be very useful for the police. There is a real-life push right now to get police wearing cameras too, I think this sort of device could…

Same usual mistake: Google Glass is NOT a proper HUD (Heads Up Display), or a proper form of Augmented Reality. It doesn't project anything on the main vision area, but only on the little screen on the upper right side.

I've used one briefly so I am aware that it is not a HUD, but it could still provide a limited form of augmented reality useful for police. Always displaying the current address, a running list of local reports, etc. With some computer vision backend, it could constantly detect and scan license plates, and display alerts to the wearer when it found stolen vehicles.

There is a lot of stuff you could do with this sort of technology. If proper HUD glasses ever become more practical, you could of course do a lot more (and you would already have officers comfortable with the general concept).

Re: Scoble says Google Glass is doomed

#48

This is the problem people have with glass, they feel like their privacy is being invaded and it is not solving a painpoint. So google is going to know who i am looking at and what products i am looking at.... come on, this is ridiculous! I need to feel that this is a utility not something of excess i do not need. This can help doctors as info on pubmed quickly, collaborate with other docters quicker especially in ur…

The privacy thing is really a big deal, it cannot be underplayed. You can probably get the public to buy into it for police, since you can sell the "it will keep the police honest" angle, but I cannot think of any painpoint that it would solve for the general public, when worn by the general public.

As for Google Ogle-detection™... I think the solution there is probably relationship counselling. That's basically an extension of the "my smartphone's GPS will allow my wife to track my every movement" problem. Trust and respect will remain as important as ever in relationships in the future.

Re: Scoble says Google Glass is doomed

#49
Biggest problem I see is in many places and situations, some one even suspected of poking a camera in peoples faces are likely to lose that camera. Maybe be gain a few bruises in return. I know full well that I would not be even slightly comfortable being in view of some one wearing these things. I mean, I don't like the NSA slurping all my data, why on Earth am I going to accept people wearing these things around me? Yeah, claim its some how different, but that isn't going to cut any ice whatsoever with me. Its a camera stealing my image and associated metadata and putting that information out of my control. I don't want people poking those damn things in my direction.

Of course, from a user sort of a well cool gadget POV, I do think its rather cool and would happily have a go on one my self.

So, while I see the merits, I think there will be a huge social problem, which may well negate mass take up. As another poster said, what may well happen is that they will be used in lots of specific situations, rather than be a general use thing. I know I'd probably like using it for specific things, or as a toy or gadget, but out and about? No, Im too pretty..... ;)

Re: Scoble says Google Glass is doomed

#50
post #42

(continuing his list) 11. You might as well carry a huge banner that says "I'm a giant nerd." You know how normal people start fidgeting and looking around for someone else to talk to the moment you mention that you work with computers? If you're wearing Google Glass, you won't even get to the hello.

I've been wearing Google Glass every time I leave the house for 2 or 3 months now. My social interactions have certainly changed; lots of people either recognize it as Glass or ask about what it is.

Bear in mind that this isn't in the valley, but in a fairly conservative part of CT. I'd be willing to bet that the vast majority of negative experiences while wearing Glass have far more to do with the wearer than the hardware.

Post reply on HN