Supply and demand, supply and demand, supply and demand. I wish more people understood this most basic law of economics. If the supply of people who are both willing and able to handle the position of university President is low, wages (which are the price of labor) will rise, thus enticing those who are able but not willing to meet the demand. The prevailing average wage rate for university Presidents is simply a re…
Does this mean that assassins making lots of money is morally justified? Does it mean that assassins are good for society, or that they deserve their pay?
Of course not. It means none of these things. Markets are amoral. Supply and demand have no moral content. Articles like this appeal to a moral logic, not an economic logic, and they are not wrong to do so.
There are other reasons why college presidents are scarce; colleges are scarce. And it's not like a thousand new colleges can spring up tomorrow to address this scarcity, because colleges have value based on social and network effects like reputation and association with elite social classes. Colleges can extract rents due their relative social position; these rents may even be immoral. I believe colleges are aware of this, and try to whitewash it with grants and aid, but is it enough?
I think you're treating the issue way too flippantly, and yes, simplistically.