Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're just another representation of a long string or number... checking or verification can be built on top of it if needed by software.
They're worse because they're not human-readable. It's easier to trick someone into scanning the wrong QR code than it is to trick someone into sending money to the wrong url, email address, phone number, etc.
Signholder Receives Over $24,000 In Bitcoin After QR Code Appears On ESPN
41–42 of 42 posts
Re: Signholder Receives Over $24,000 In Bitcoin After QR Code Appears On ESPN
#42Story about Bitcoin being a good thing on Hacker News. Cue negativity: Comment negative about scams, silly stories and QR codes being bad - check Deeply cynical comment - "They were probably donating for their own gain" - check Skeptical comment that this isn't true - check You're a cynical, negative bunch of pissants these days, HN.
I'm not sure how you could look at HN and think it's anything but zealous about Bitcoins. You'd have to have some deep and powerful victimization complex. I only ever see comments like yours on Bitcoin articles. Most every other article, HN is even more negative, and everyone goes along with it, but as soon as it's about Bitcoin, "How dare you say those things!" It's almost as if you've convinced yourself of Bitcoin…
I think Reddit.com/r/Bitcoin is zealous about Bitcoins, not HN. And you know what? I prefer it. At least people there seem happy, unlike here.
YMMV of course...