Facebook is for grandparents: What we need in a next-gen social network
41–50 of 87 posts
Re: Facebook is for grandparents: What we need in a next-gen social network
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
some tech has short run; and some entertainment has long runs (like ER TV show), but these are exceptions to the rule. Your search engine, Google has enjoyed a 14 year run, and is going strong. Windows OS has enjoyed a nearly 30 years run so far. Kardashians on the other hand, enjoyed only a couple of years of popularity. This is what I mean.
Facebook has to evolve from being entertainment, to being technology. For example, look at Steam. It's a platform for distributing games. It's not going away any time soon. They work to improve the platform. They're going to open the platform up, so everyone can publish games. They're not simply a website that tries to sell you games. Facebook needs to do the same if they want to survive. They need to stop being a so…
Re: Facebook is for grandparents: What we need in a next-gen social network
#43A see a huge problem with the shared profit thing, with virtual worthless points like Likes you already have all sorts of retardness from people dying to pull a hit stunt to profile for a dead baby mummy, can you imagine if the users were paid for the attention their posts get? "A thousand likes or this kitty goes in the microwave". I think the nice new place to be would be one where you are not the product, doesn't…
Re: Facebook is for grandparents: What we need in a next-gen social network
#44The social networks are like TV shows. They have a limited run. This is because it's entertainment, rather than tech. Hollywood knows how this works, and they do not incorporate or IPO each individual TV show: instead they incorporate studios, that produce many different shows. Facebook is forced into this model too by reality, thus they bought Instagram, and tried to buy Snapchat. Those shows will also have a limite…
The fact that one effect of social networks is to entertain people, and the fact that TV shows also have the effect of entertaining people, does not imply social networks are therefore bound to the rules/generalizations of TV shows.
Re: Facebook is for grandparents: What we need in a next-gen social network
#45Re: Facebook is for grandparents: What we need in a next-gen social network
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you think of Reddit in that framework? Reddit itself is explicitly a tool for creating, basically, community sites. How closely does it fit with your vision of a tool for crafting social networks? When do you predict it will fail?
Facebook revolves around making people interesting and providing people-based content to consume. Reddit revolves around people finding interesting content and providing it to others to be consumed with some commentary on the side. I'm not sure how they're comparable. Sure, reddit has a community aspect, but it's really just a side dish compared to the content (links).
Re: Facebook is for grandparents: What we need in a next-gen social network
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you think of Reddit in that framework? Reddit itself is explicitly a tool for creating, basically, community sites. How closely does it fit with your vision of a tool for crafting social networks? When do you predict it will fail?
Facebook revolves around making people interesting and providing people-based content to consume. Reddit revolves around people finding interesting content and providing it to others to be consumed with some commentary on the side. I'm not sure how they're comparable. Sure, reddit has a community aspect, but it's really just a side dish compared to the content (links).
Re: Facebook is for grandparents: What we need in a next-gen social network
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you think of Reddit in that framework? Reddit itself is explicitly a tool for creating, basically, community sites. How closely does it fit with your vision of a tool for crafting social networks? When do you predict it will fail?
Facebook revolves around making people interesting and providing people-based content to consume. Reddit revolves around people finding interesting content and providing it to others to be consumed with some commentary on the side. I'm not sure how they're comparable. Sure, reddit has a community aspect, but it's really just a side dish compared to the content (links).
Many of the subreddits (e.g. the ones dedicated to cities or schools) are far more about the community than the content.
Re: Facebook is for grandparents: What we need in a next-gen social network
#49The social networks are like TV shows. They have a limited run. This is because it's entertainment, rather than tech. Hollywood knows how this works, and they do not incorporate or IPO each individual TV show: instead they incorporate studios, that produce many different shows. Facebook is forced into this model too by reality, thus they bought Instagram, and tried to buy Snapchat. Those shows will also have a limite…
Does this mean I'm going to have to rescue my data every time a software/network is "retired"?
Re: Facebook is for grandparents: What we need in a next-gen social network
#50Anyone else feel that no one knows this "next-generation social network" better than, well, the next generation? I'm talking about today's young teens and little kids. Facebook took off during our time because we were the cool demographic back then. It was everything we wanted and needed that MySpace and Friendster failed to give. I think it's difficult for us to comprehend what the next-gen social network will be be…