41–50 of 61 posts
I find it strange that the icon used is so similar to StackOverflow's if this isn't an app built by the same people.
I find it strange that the icon used is so similar to StackOverflow's if this isn't an app built by the same people.
I asked myself the same question. At first I thought it was some kind of editor using the Stack Overflow Markdown flavor. It's really confusing.
1. Item one
2. Item two
a. Subitem a
b. Subitem bWhat I want to see is an open source markdown editor that renders the preview as you type where you type (not side by side). For an example check out http://mangomarkdown.com/ (which powers foldingtext). There are a few projects that do this, but not open source, that I can find! It might not be that hard to change the current ones that go side by side to do this. (I am planning to work on one, but have not gotten ar…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I asked myself the same question. At first I thought it was some kind of editor using the Stack Overflow Markdown flavor. It's really confusing.
It is an editor using PageDown, the Stack Overflow Markdown flavor.
Markdown needs nested ordered lists. I would like to convert legal documents to markdown, but I can't. For example: 1. Item one 2. Item two a. Subitem a b. Subitem b
1. Item one
1. Item two
1. Subitem a
1. Subitem b
(I replaced a, b and 2 by 1 to force the automatic numbering)
Markdown needs nested ordered lists. I would like to convert legal documents to markdown, but I can't. For example: 1. Item one 2. Item two a. Subitem a b. Subitem b
isn't that an implementation issue? your example doesn't work indeed in the StackEdit link, but 1. Item one 1. Item two 1. Subitem a 1. Subitem b does work, so that let me think that you just need to improve the parser to consider "a b c" as a valid ordered list, and maybe "i ii iii" at the same time? (I replaced a, b and 2 by 1 to force the automatic numbering)
Markdown needs nested ordered lists. I would like to convert legal documents to markdown, but I can't. For example: 1. Item one 2. Item two a. Subitem a b. Subitem b
isn't that an implementation issue? your example doesn't work indeed in the StackEdit link, but 1. Item one 1. Item two 1. Subitem a 1. Subitem b does work, so that let me think that you just need to improve the parser to consider "a b c" as a valid ordered list, and maybe "i ii iii" at the same time? (I replaced a, b and 2 by 1 to force the automatic numbering)