Live data from Hacker News

We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 77 posts

Re: We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

#41

As a newer HN user I was surprised that there are no comments on job postings. I've also noticed some interesting posts and think there could be some constructive conversation around them. I can appreciate why there are no comments but also I think it would be interesting to allow direct feedback to job postings. Anyone else ever thought this, too?

Comments are off on job postings because they tend to become a running critique of the company or product doing the posting.

Y Combinator is a business...

Re: We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

#42

As a newer HN user I was surprised that there are no comments on job postings. I've also noticed some interesting posts and think there could be some constructive conversation around them. I can appreciate why there are no comments but also I think it would be interesting to allow direct feedback to job postings. Anyone else ever thought this, too?

Comments are off on job postings because they tend to become a running critique of the company or product doing the posting.

Oh, so this has beed tried before?

Re: We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit allows users to comment on ads. 99% of the time it doesn't go well, especially if they are being dishonest.

God I love reddit. Nothing warms my heart as much as an angry anonymous mob full of inside jokes and puns attacking idiocy in advertising.

[deleted]

Re: We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

#45
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit allows users to comment on ads. 99% of the time it doesn't go well, especially if they are being dishonest.

HN is, at least in theory, a place where being polite when giving feedback is the norm. Reddit, on the other hand, is a place where humour and rudeness is not only expected, but wanted by the majority.

in the mainstream subreddits, yes. But in the more niche ones, the discourse is civil if not heartwarming (I frequent the bicycling subreddit, personally)

Re: We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

#46

YC companies always have the worst link-baiting lines to get you to click on their job offers. Just put them in a standard template so we know who is looking for what before clicking on the link. I propose: {company} ({yc season}) looking for {role} Role should be the actual function title and if applicable mentioning the language-stack (i.e. RoR, node) the candidate should master.

I think it's ironic that the monthly "who's hiring" posts follow such a guideline and try to inform the potential applicant as much as possible, yet these YC jobpostings go the exact opposite route.

Re: We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

#47
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN is, at least in theory, a place where being polite when giving feedback is the norm. Reddit, on the other hand, is a place where humour and rudeness is not only expected, but wanted by the majority.

in the mainstream subreddits, yes. But in the more niche ones, the discourse is civil if not heartwarming (I frequent the bicycling subreddit, personally)

Sure, I just meant within the same 99% that minimaxir was talking about regarding the adverts. (I've found plenty of friendly people in sports, gay and classical music sub-reddits myself.)

Re: We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

#48
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I figured they would learn by getting called out like this. And since the post was anonymous, it doesn't really hurt them anyway. Free learning experience.

I agree with this (particularly since it's anonymous), but piling on seems kind of mean. Another option would be to simply email the given address and state your complaints. For example that you may have been interested (if you were), but felt mislead by the posting.

The reason I publicly posted this is because it is an issue about community standards, not just a personal issue between me and the company.

It's interesting to think about my own motivations -- I wonder if I would have been gentler if their post hadn't been anonymous. If so, should I have been gentler even though their post was anonymous? Anyway, I apologize if this caused unnecessary hurt, I didn't mean to.

Re: We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

#49
post #33

It wouldn't have been that bad had they made one simple change .. from (20% of College Students) to (20% of ) or (20% of a major public university). It would have actually been more impressive if they weren't so vague .. now they are probably going to turn off a lot of good prospects. I say this as a YC alum whose 1st job post was fairly ill-advised (though not dishonest). Believe me, it is quite tempting to play aro…

well what if it's 20% of the National University of Singapore? That's not exactly a big name school in the Bay Area. (By now I have an idea which company this is)

The ad says "small team based in the Bay Area" so I doubt it's the National University of Singapore.

Re: We're only being dishonest to get your attention. Join us!

#50

YC companies always have the worst link-baiting lines to get you to click on their job offers. Just put them in a standard template so we know who is looking for what before clicking on the link. I propose: {company} ({yc season}) looking for {role} Role should be the actual function title and if applicable mentioning the language-stack (i.e. RoR, node) the candidate should master.

I think it's ironic that the monthly "who's hiring" posts follow such a guideline and try to inform the potential applicant as much as possible, yet these YC jobpostings go the exact opposite route.

The real irony is the "who's hiring" posts get to the front page the hard way.
Post reply on HN