Live data from Hacker News

The algorithm for a perfectly balanced photo gallery

crispymtn.com

41–50 of 104 posts

Re: The algorithm for a perfectly balanced photo gallery

#41
post #37
post #25

btw this breaks zoom.

Your comment is almost useless. On which browser? Which operating system? What do you expect to happen? What actually happens? http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html

Bug reports can only be as useful as the people who receive them. Try zooming with any browser; you'd expect it to, hum, zoom, but what actually happens is that after zooming, the pictures get resized again, so no matter how you zoom, it always looks the same.

Re: The algorithm for a perfectly balanced photo gallery

#44
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree, that looks very nice. I might be wrong here but I think the background is just the picture, although scaled and has got many filters on it.

Actually, you're right! It's the same picture, scaled down to around 500x500 and with a heavy gaussian blur applied to it. The trick is to have a subtle grain effect over it to eliminate gradient artifacts.

It looks really great!

Re: The algorithm for a perfectly balanced photo gallery

#46
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Rdio's app (rdio.com) also nails this.

Rdio does some fantastic design work. Just a shame their engineering is so bad that I can't even use the app.

Their design is just fantastic - especially with the latest update which added better Stations support. When it was first released it was wicked snappy and kind of slowed way down for a while and got annoying - agreed.

In the past month or two, though, it's gotten damn responsive (for me at least). Give it another shot if you haven't used it recently.

Re: The algorithm for a perfectly balanced photo gallery

#50
Since when it is ok to suppose visitors know to click the escape key to go back. And where is the link to go up to the gallery. I had to mess with the url or I was gone for a long back button session. Morevoer it is very slow.

Just to add some negativeness to the generaly positive comments here.

Post reply on HN