Live data from Hacker News

Feedly Pro

cloud.feedly.com

41–50 of 68 posts

Re: Feedly Pro

#41
post #19

You know something's wrong with your RSS reader when it has a support queue, and people are willing to pay for bumping to the front of it.

You're unfair. The other option would be to offer no support for free plans and only have support for those who pays.

Re: Feedly Pro

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The idea that because it's free it's above all criticism is simply unreasonable. Solution: shut down the free version. Addressing complaints from free users who demand things captures absolutely zero value when you're a struggling startup with too much else to do and limited resources still trying to make a viable business. Freemium doesn't work unless you're swimming in VC money and only care about user growth, no…

Shut down the free service and no one will get hooked to your product, and choose a another free service to start with, and maybe even pay for it later. Providing both free and payed tier is the way to go, especially in the commodity market segment like RSS readers, unless you are in a niche without too much competition.

I disagree. RSS readers have a significant long tail expense per user. I worked at Bloglines. Pretty much every one of those free users have extra little RSS feeds that nobody else subscribes to that you have to crawl, handle invalid rss/xml for, update and keep unread status on. At scale, that is the most expensive part of operating an RSS reader, and it's not worth it.

Re: Feedly Pro

#44
post #43

Seems ironic to have a "lifetime" pro option, as its predecessor's lifetime was cut short.

we live until we die, and unfortunately sometimes we die earlier than we want to :)

Re: Feedly Pro

#45
I would be put off paying $99 for a lifetime account. These should be available up to 5,000, but users should be able to still opt for the $5 or $45 options.

Re: Feedly Pro

#47
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are plenty of reasons to prefer secure browsing by default. Perhaps I subscribe to feeds that would be flagged as "suspect" by programs like PRISM[1] and XKeyscore[2], and would like to make the NSA work at least a little bit to find that out. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XKeyscore

So, then if it's that important to you, give the people giving you the cover of HTTPS some money, stop being a cheapskate.

It so happens that I consider HTTPS by default for all users a requirement. A problem which a pro subscription does not solve.

Re: Feedly Pro

#48
post #43

Seems ironic to have a "lifetime" pro option, as its predecessor's lifetime was cut short.

I suppose it's less ironic when you consider that its predecessor's lifetime was cut short, in part, because they didn't charge for their product. ;)

Re: Feedly Pro

#49
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are plenty of reasons to prefer secure browsing by default. Perhaps I subscribe to feeds that would be flagged as "suspect" by programs like PRISM[1] and XKeyscore[2], and would like to make the NSA work at least a little bit to find that out. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XKeyscore

And you can pay for that feature. I have no real stake in the game here, but I'm failing to see why that is a must-have feature for every user of the service.

Feasibly, the lack of HTTPS for a subset of users could be used as an attack vector against Feedly, which could surface information about me that I do not want revealed even if I were a Pro user using HTTPS.

Re: Feedly Pro

#50
post #10

I was wondering how long it would take for them to find a business model.

selling https access doesn't sound like a good one for me, this should be a basic feature with NSA and who knows who else listening in on everything.

They aren't selling https, they're selling early access to https, plus search, priority support, and some other stuff.

https://twitter.com/feedly/status/364340330172137472

Post reply on HN