Earlier quoted context omitted.
The documents don't say that the FBI was planning this. They say a third party was. The FBI redacted who that third party was. I'm wondering why there haven't beeny any arrests yet.
> I'm wondering why there haven't beeny any arrests yet. Because making such a plan is protected by the First Amendment. Carrying it out is not.
FBI Document: [DELETED] had "plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire"
41–50 of 152 posts
Re: FBI Document: [DELETED] had "plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire"
#42Re: FBI Document: [DELETED] had "plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire"
#43Googling shows it is suddenly back, often with errors (e.g., InfoWars reports it as the FBI had a plan to kill OWS people).
Re: FBI Document: [DELETED] had "plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire"
#44Re: FBI Document: [DELETED] had "plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire"
#45I've done some research before upvoting this. I thought whowhatwhy.com would be some kind of conspiracy site, but they just do investigative journalism. They are usually featured in Salon.com. http://www.salon.com/topic/whowhatwhy/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russ_Baker Also, it's known that the FBI coordinated the crackdown on Occupy: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coor...
Well that definitely justifies upvoting a speculative conspiracy theory to the front page of Hacker News. Given that the US is literally Nazi Germany, it's 100% believable that the FBI would murder protesters. I wish the sheeple could see the US for what it really is: literally Nazi Germany. People like us here on HN and reddit understand what's really going on, unlike the sheeple.
Re: FBI Document: [DELETED] had "plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire"
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
The documents don't say that the FBI was planning this. They say a third party was. The FBI redacted who that third party was. I'm wondering why there haven't beeny any arrests yet.
> I'm wondering why there haven't beeny any arrests yet. Because making such a plan is protected by the First Amendment. Carrying it out is not.
Re: FBI Document: [DELETED] had "plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire"
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm wondering why there haven't beeny any arrests yet. Because making such a plan is protected by the First Amendment. Carrying it out is not.
That's a nice theory, but there's a news article every fortnight these days about someone getting chucked in the slammer for a casual, jokey remark on twitter being interpreted as a "terrorist threat".
Do remember that a police officer who threatened to kill the First Lady still has his job.
Re: FBI Document: [DELETED] had "plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire"
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
The documents don't say that the FBI was planning this. They say a third party was. The FBI redacted who that third party was. I'm wondering why there haven't beeny any arrests yet.
> I'm wondering why there haven't beeny any arrests yet. Because making such a plan is protected by the First Amendment. Carrying it out is not.
Re: FBI Document: [DELETED] had "plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire"
#49I've done some research before upvoting this. I thought whowhatwhy.com would be some kind of conspiracy site, but they just do investigative journalism. They are usually featured in Salon.com. http://www.salon.com/topic/whowhatwhy/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russ_Baker Also, it's known that the FBI coordinated the crackdown on Occupy: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coor...
But how can this be true?! tptacek just told us [1]: > nobody is going to shoot you and your friends in the head for marching around and > They won't even point firehoses at you, or sic dogs on you. You are freer than Americans have been at virtually any other point in our country's history [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5987208
Re: FBI Document: [DELETED] had "plan to kill local Occupy leaders via sniper fire"
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm wondering why there haven't beeny any arrests yet. Because making such a plan is protected by the First Amendment. Carrying it out is not.
No. Conspiring to commit murder is definitely not protected by the First Amendment. And even fantasizing openly, which should be protected as long as no attempt is made to act on the fantasy, has tended to get people locked up in recent years.
A charge of conspiracy requires at least two conspirants and an overt act.