I have to imagine their recruiting is going to suffer greatly due to the recent revelations. Very few smart people are going to want to join an organization that spies on their fellow citizens. Plus, the NSA is going to have to be even more skeptical of anyone they do recruit.
A lot of people just don't care. They want a job with other smart people and neat technology where they can do math in peace and quiet. See also "You don't need to worry if you don't have anything to hide" etc.
Students Question the NSA at Recruiting Session [audio]
41–50 of 196 posts
Re: Students Question the NSA at Recruiting Session [audio]
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have no sympathy. They willingly represent the organization. Nobody is forcing them to stay. They could leave, but they don't, thus implicitly accepting it.
I imagine the fear of not being able to provide for you or your family takes precedence over privacy concerns for the vast majority of people. There was a news report about how 76% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck last week. I'd argue saying "they could leave" assumes a lot.
Everybody dies. Few people live.
Re: Students Question the NSA at Recruiting Session [audio]
#43Why are they doing student recruiting right now? I imagine all sessions would go like this.
Sales of horse meat rose after food contamination scares in UK. Also, we want ethical people working for them, because then there's more people to say "Is this legal?" when an order for intelligence comes in.
I don't buy the classic "change the organization from within" line. If that were the proper thing to encourage then we should all be running out looking for the most despicable corporations to work for and the most horrendous governments to pay taxes to.
Re: Students Question the NSA at Recruiting Session [audio]
#44Re: Students Question the NSA at Recruiting Session [audio]
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have no sympathy. They willingly represent the organization. Nobody is forcing them to stay. They could leave, but they don't, thus implicitly accepting it.
I imagine the fear of not being able to provide for you or your family takes precedence over privacy concerns for the vast majority of people. There was a news report about how 76% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck last week. I'd argue saying "they could leave" assumes a lot.
Re: Students Question the NSA at Recruiting Session [audio]
#46I have some sympathy for the recruiters since they really have no say in the high level decision making in the organization. They may not even be involved with domestic spying of citizens. But on the other hand they continue to stay at the organization so while I do feel some sympathy for their predicament,I guess it's really just up to each person to figure out whether they're really okay with staying there, given a…
Re: Students Question the NSA at Recruiting Session [audio]
#47I have some sympathy for the recruiters since they really have no say in the high level decision making in the organization. They may not even be involved with domestic spying of citizens. But on the other hand they continue to stay at the organization so while I do feel some sympathy for their predicament,I guess it's really just up to each person to figure out whether they're really okay with staying there, given a…
I have no sympathy. They willingly represent the organization. Nobody is forcing them to stay. They could leave, but they don't, thus implicitly accepting it.
Re: Students Question the NSA at Recruiting Session [audio]
#48I have some sympathy for the recruiters since they really have no say in the high level decision making in the organization. They may not even be involved with domestic spying of citizens. But on the other hand they continue to stay at the organization so while I do feel some sympathy for their predicament,I guess it's really just up to each person to figure out whether they're really okay with staying there, given a…
Re: Students Question the NSA at Recruiting Session [audio]
#49As Federal employees, the men and women who work at the NSA swear an oath which dates back to 1884: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and fait…