http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/en/1.4-branch...
Web Framework Benchmarks Round 4
41–50 of 358 posts
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 4
#42I love what you guys are doing. This is by far the most comprehensive (in terms of number of frameworks) comparison of web frameworks. I also am a big fan of the new filtering metadata. However, I'm starting to think that all of the advocates of various frameworks are now conspiring independently to make this comparison meaningless...any framework (except Cake for some reason) can be superoptimized towards a small se…
Thanks for the kind words. We're very interested in adding additional tests, this round even includes a new test dubbed "Fortunes" which does in fact do server-side templating. We have an open github issue[1] asking for the community's input for just this sort of thing, and we'd love to have your feedback included. [1] https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/issues/13...
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 4
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe because the server is not running Windows? Edit: yeah right Mono and w/e
Would it be too much to ask to also run a Windows VM? Or use Mono?
"As with the previous question, we'd love to. We have heard tentative word from a reader/contributor that a pull request may be incoming soon that will include several .NET frameworks on Mono, which we assume will be as easy to include as any other pull request. One challenge we face is that the test infrastructure we've built assumes a Linux deployment that we can automate using ssh and Python. To do a proper .NET test on Windows Servers, we will need to work on adapting that platform to automate Windows Servers as well. Community assistance on this would be greatly appreciated."
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 4
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not that PHP is particularly fast, but I notice that Raw PHP does about middle of the pack, but all of the ORM versions seem to do terribly. Interesting stuff. I've usually had pretty good luck with Slim, I'll have to try a version with & without redbean and see how big a difference it makes.
If their FAQ's page is saying what I think it does, then they aren't testing with memcache or opcode caching. Also no love for Yii.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 4
#45For those new to these benchmarks, all of the source code is up on github: https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks We welcome all pull requests, suggestions and criticisms.
I guess though if this is only testing JSON serialization, it may not make sense. Perhaps adding JAX-RS implementations like CXF, Jersey, RESTEasy, and RESTLet would be more appropriate.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 4
#46Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 4
#47Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 4
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not that PHP is particularly fast, but I notice that Raw PHP does about middle of the pack, but all of the ORM versions seem to do terribly. Interesting stuff. I've usually had pretty good luck with Slim, I'll have to try a version with & without redbean and see how big a difference it makes.
Actually, as soon as a lot of db connections are involved, PHP jumps to the head of the pack. Which means that in most common web use cases (which are db heavy), PHP is as fast as any of them, since all the slowdowns (initialization, slow Zend engine etc) are dwarfed out by the fast db handling.
If I filter to just show PHP, the 20 query test shows that the first framework is less than 50% the performance of raw PHP.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 4
#49Re: Web Framework Benchmarks Round 4
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe because the server is not running Windows? Edit: yeah right Mono and w/e
Would it be too much to ask to also run a Windows VM? Or use Mono?