Earlier quoted context omitted.
How would you calculate what would constitute statistically significant results for each of these sites? How about any other site?
It doesn't really have anything to do with the site... it has to do with what the difference is vs. the total size of the sample. If you see a 50% increase but only had 3 people in your sample, that is not statistically significant because the probability of that happening by chance is so high. To make this concrete, if the actual proportion was 4:1 against that figure (as in, you "should" have measured a whopping de…
I failed to make the point of my question clear enough. Nickpotier critiqued the results without offering up any numbers. I wanted to see what he thought the numbers should have been for each example given.