41–50 of 144 posts
Under what circumstances does the metadata get added? When Claude Code CLI needs a media file usually I just see it run an imagemagick or ffmpeg command to create one, which isn't going to have C2PA metadata. Edit: I asked Opus 5 for "a jpg of a cat" via the web chat. It did it by writing an svg and then rendering that to a jpeg. Clicking the "download" button saved a jpg which did have C2PA metadata, seemingly injec…
This is really fascinating. Even the AI companies have incentives to reject AI generated content. It's like they want you to use AI for everything, but they don't want AI output fed back to them. At work, right after an AI training, we were asked to use our "authentic" voice when writing mid year reviews.
Just like the tech company owners not allowing their kids access to social media…
That’s a cute way to imply their service is used to generate misinformation. They are basically saying to not trust the AI content made from their own product :)
>Supported formats: JPG, PNG, GIF, WEBP, TIFF, HEIC, AVIF, SVG, DNG, JXL, MP4, MOV, AVI, WAV, MP3, M4A, FLAC · up to 100 MB I'm wondering why they have restricted file types. You can't check a PDF for example... surely the main use case for people will be to check if a document was produced or edited by an LLM? That could be an attractive (if not misunderstood) proposition for academics
Luckily all pdfs I made in academia have been generated from source (tex or derivatives, asciidoc) and llm are better in generating source than pdf. Even people that didn’t use tex used Word to generate the pdf. So I’m unsure what your aiming at.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You misunderstand how Claude watermarks things.
Most critics of watermarking have no idea how it works. Yet there are valid arguments against (and for) it, but they prefer to be misleading
You can resave the file and the "made with Claude" signal disappears, but you cannot make a random file pass as Claude-made without Anthropic's signing key. So the useful guarantee is one-way. No signature means almost nothing.
How long before they change the terms and conditions to subtly claim ownership of your files? When you write code they already insert Co author attribution/ Say I write a text by hand And then I tell it to clean up the grammar and fix some sentences Did it make it? This is also interesting for those companies that siphoned the entire open web
Microsoft Word has not claimed ownership in 40 years. Why would Anthropic do?
This is just C2PA for Claude-processed files, apparently. It's not related to their text watermarking. C2PA is file metadata and can be trivially stripped away, unlike hidden watermarks, e.g. SynthID.
That is where their responsibility ends in terms of the EU AI Act. And that is fine and how it should be, no secret watermarks.
This is just C2PA for Claude-processed files, apparently. It's not related to their text watermarking. C2PA is file metadata and can be trivially stripped away, unlike hidden watermarks, e.g. SynthID.
That is where their responsibility ends in terms of the EU AI Act. And that is fine and how it should be, no secret watermarks.