Live data from Hacker News

Student teacher arrested for private Snapchat message

gadgetreview.com

41–50 of 93 posts

Re: Student teacher arrested for private Snapchat message

#41
post #25

Is this article written by AI? The story telling seems distinctly AI

> She meant it as a frustrated joke. Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor. While humans do write this way, it starts to get unbearable when you put it next to all the other AI patterns, including the very first sentence. I closed the article after painfully completing the first paragraph.

Same, this is like blogspam in the days of old that doesn't add anything to the original content and is just there to generate revenue for this site. The linked posts are better and per HN guidelines the toplink should probably be changed to one of those.

Re: Student teacher arrested for private Snapchat message

#42

Thou shalt not vent to another. Thou shalt keep thine frustrations within, until thou hadst a mental breakdown and art permanently locked in a padded room.

i think the lesson is to just not do it on snapchat, rather than bottle it up until breakdown.

(face to face > signal > .... > snapchat)

Re: Student teacher arrested for private Snapchat message

#44
post #33
post #19

Story aside, I'm most concerned with how closing a laptop "deleted" the lesson plan! It's hard to imagine how that could occur, and I've worked with a lot of people who aren't very technical.

I just spent an hour this morning talking with a friend who had an important saved draft email disappear after closing her laptop. Software is shit these days.

> Software is shit these days.

This is true, and we've trained end-users to pay for it, anyway.

Re: Student teacher arrested for private Snapchat message

#45

> "Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor." Presumably, the actual text of the message was reviewed by a human? So the human(s) didn't get the humor either? EDIT: by "humans" I mean the FBI / cops.

That's a really generous presumption. The direction this industry is moving towards is to use AI to avoid human involvement.

At best, their algorithm flagged it, and a human rubber-stamped it.

Re: Student teacher arrested for private Snapchat message

#46

How is that not considered libel or slander? That seems like a home-run case to sue the hell out of Snapchat for damaging her reputation for a joke made in a private conversation.

What part of this was lying about what she had said?

I think the entire thing is absurd but libel usually requires falsehoods to be published. Slander is similar. It isn't just "damaged reputation"

Re: Student teacher arrested for private Snapchat message

#47
post #19

Story aside, I'm most concerned with how closing a laptop "deleted" the lesson plan! It's hard to imagine how that could occur, and I've worked with a lot of people who aren't very technical.

Most likely a SaaS app that auto-saves, but didn’t save properly. Then closing the laptop caused a network disconnect, and the in-browser app did not recover gracefully while awaiting reconnect on wake-up and lost all unsaved data. This would have been unbelievable to me before this year. Then I used PowerPoint via the browser and found this level of data loss is a regular occurrence.

I have these problems with Zed on my local fs. Science is hard.

Re: Student teacher arrested for private Snapchat message

#48

Is this article written by AI? The story telling seems distinctly AI

100% >Your Snapchat DMs feel like a locked apartment — but the building management reportedly kept a spare key.

It's like their system prompts have a line that says, "Use analogies everywhere. Humans love analogies."

Re: Student teacher arrested for private Snapchat message

#49
post #7

This is why you use end to end encrypted communications.

If you do not control the application that sends messages, the application can always do E2E, only to spy on the messages on the end devices and snitch if necessary... We need E2E + no "bonus features", and to ensure both hold you need to review the code.

Re: Student teacher arrested for private Snapchat message

#50

> "Snapchat’s algorithm didn’t get the humor." Presumably, the actual text of the message was reviewed by a human? So the human(s) didn't get the humor either? EDIT: by "humans" I mean the FBI / cops.

Why would a human review it? That only drives up costs for the company. Easier to use algorithms for everything and maybe pay the occasional fine when something goes seriously wrong and legal proceedings result.
Post reply on HN