41–50 of 231 posts
I understand the need to shame this platform, but why expose all their clients to this much risk? This disclosure here just named a whole bunch of clients. Why?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I read the entire article. Did you? There’s no reason in there to expose this company’s clients. Edit - Are you capable of answering my actual question or was that the best you could do?
He has been emailing the CEO for six months with no replies. This is has also been posted here before with not a single pip or comment ... :-) And these customers absolute lack of technical due diligence, on this nth example, of move fast and break things...makes them deserve what they are getting.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
He has been emailing the CEO for six months with no replies. This is has also been posted here before with not a single pip or comment ... :-) And these customers absolute lack of technical due diligence, on this nth example, of move fast and break things...makes them deserve what they are getting.
> And these customers absolute lack of technical due diligence, on this nth example, of move fast and break things...makes them deserve what they are getting. That’s a garbage take. These customers didn’t move fast or break things. They trusted a company that made a promise and that company let them down.
That is a Boeing and Volkswagen type of excuse. The engineers did it!
But they try to play it off as though this were public data:
> Public sharing settings across AI and SaaS products have surfaced similar findings in recent months. Anthropic addressed exposed public artifacts across Claude and its MCP ecosystem via Google Search.
Also, interesting, they are SOC2 compliant [1], proving again that SOC2 is meaningless/useless.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sturgeon's Law is proved correct time and again. Most things are crap. Most people produce some crap in their lives. Some people only produce crap. Those people still need to eat but unfortunately some of them (somehow) find their way into tech and actually convince people to pay money for crap. Especially with a low bar to entry like what is essentially AI-backed transcription-as-a-service, I'm not sure 90% is high…
Fortunately we have LLM's to not produce that crap... wait, those LLM's were trained on the existing crap and produce the same crap... oh no.
Seems like they fixed this a few days ago: https://tldv.io/blog/our-thoughts-on-the-darkreading-com-art... But they try to play it off as though this were public data: > Public sharing settings across AI and SaaS products have surfaced similar findings in recent months. Anthropic addressed exposed public artifacts across Claude and its MCP ecosystem via Google Search. Also, interesting, they are SOC2 compliant [1], p…