Earlier quoted context omitted.
PBA = Police Benevolent Association > How can you assume the LEOs with variable ethics are in the 80% and not the 20%? Is that a real question? Having strict ethics is a higher bar than variable ethics. How can you assume that more LEO’s are strictly ethical than varying their ethics when you literally brought up > Interestingly the things that LEOs are strictly ethical about varies by interaction and preconceptions…
You seemed determined to get messy rather than legitimately discuss where we are not seeing eye to eye. Yes, definitions matter. Yes, I do see difficulties in two strangers discussing this. Yes, the behaviour of LEOs changes depending on who they interact with and yes they can be oblivious to that change. When I say that most of our state LEO's have strict adherence to the code of ethics, I mean that. When I say thos…
When Terrance Howard says 1x1 = 2, he also means that and it’s as equally coherent.
They cannot strictly adhere to a code of ethics and simultaneously violate it when it comes to people they don’t care about. The “strict” part would require them to always adhere to said ethics.