Very interesting and well written article. This sentence in particular: "Linn Products is the Glasgow company Ivor Tiefenbrun founded in 1972, and if you know it at all you know it for the Sondek LP12, still widely regarded by its partisans as the finest record deck ever made." I was a big audiophile right at that time. Auditioned both Sondek and Sota Star Saphire. Went with the latter which I still proudly own (Alph…
Yeah but also saying "it's considered the best by the people who love it" is a tautology.
The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal
41–50 of 50 posts
Re: The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal
#42Too bad british goverments had to kill companies like that. But the new business plan is going much better!
Re: The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Very well-written text, not a whiff of AI generation to it. Your example is not even a run-on sentence! I enjoyed reading it, many thanks to the author.
I really enjoyed it, but I think there’s more than a whiff. > That curve is gone. The compromise is going with it; and the workload-shaped machine, the thing Harland was building in 1984, is what comes back.
Re: The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Very well-written text, not a whiff of AI generation to it. Your example is not even a run-on sentence! I enjoyed reading it, many thanks to the author.
I really enjoyed it, but I think there’s more than a whiff. > That curve is gone. The compromise is going with it; and the workload-shaped machine, the thing Harland was building in 1984, is what comes back.
I really enjoy this style and I think it's not _that_ close to AI output (it's much better in fact).
Re: The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I really enjoyed it, but I think there’s more than a whiff. > That curve is gone. The compromise is going with it; and the workload-shaped machine, the thing Harland was building in 1984, is what comes back.
Nope, and Pangram agrees with me, 100% human written with high confidence. I really enjoy this style and I think it's not _that_ close to AI output (it's much better in fact).
Re: The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nope, and Pangram agrees with me, 100% human written with high confidence. I really enjoy this style and I think it's not _that_ close to AI output (it's much better in fact).
I was never arguing that it was AI-written.
Re: The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Depends on the canal. The UK narrow boat network has locked everywhere so minimal current in most sections similarly the Netherlands. In fact most canals. But then you have something like Suez which is just open to the ocean.
The UK locks themselves are water movement though, so if you wanted to power something for "free" on those, you'd attach it to there. Oh man did I love watching those as a kid. You wouldn't do a fan though, you'd have a line and a buoy and use the up and down motion to drive a linear electromagnetic generator to harvest energy.
Re: The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
The UK locks themselves are water movement though, so if you wanted to power something for "free" on those, you'd attach it to there. Oh man did I love watching those as a kid. You wouldn't do a fan though, you'd have a line and a buoy and use the up and down motion to drive a linear electromagnetic generator to harvest energy.
Yeah but it's not really a lateral flow of water when the locks fill up and empty.
Re: The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal
#49Re: The Computer at the Bottom of a Canal
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you expand on your paper computer? It sounds fascinating.
It was more than 40 years ago, before I had the skills to build chips, I'm afraid I've kept nothing of that design