Kind of. From what I've been told, the non-trust-me-bro solution is did:web, which is just "you host a file on a web server containing all the same information the PLC serves". Problem is, if you already have a did:plc, you're stuck with it - you cannot migrate off a DID, as it's intended to be about as immutable as an SQL primary key.
There are also read-only mirrors of the PLC, but that doesn't really matter, given that the whole point of the PLC is to be a trusted[1] entity for arbitrating identity conflicts. This is necessary because the PLC is what lets you register new signing keys to overrule an uncooperative PDS - otherwise, you have the moral equivalent of Mastodon instances where an instance admin can hold your identity hostage.
And, technically speaking, did:web is also "trust-me-bro", in the sense that it ultimately relies on DNS to resolve names to servers. DNS and PLC are moral equivalents[0] in that ultimately there is a central authority to arbitrate disputes over who owns what identities. In fact, there kind of has to be. Every proposal for a true distributed identity system ultimately boils down to either pinning a self-signed key or web-of-trust, both of which have undesirable failure modes due to the lack of a central trusted authority.
Ultimately, the choice comes down to: do you want to pay the DNS people $15/yr for a zone to host your DID on, or do you trust Bluesky's PLC server to offer that hosting for free?
[0] Almost. In practice, DNS is a recursively nested set of central governors; every TLD imposes an additional governor on top of ICANN root zone management. In practice, almost all DNS shenanigans happen at registrars; and of the shenanigans not caused by registrars, most of them happen at the TLD operators and not the root zone itself.
[1] PLC stores all identity updates in an append-only log. I'd call it a blockchain, but the Bitcoin people ruined that term. Practically speaking, if the PLC were to "turn evil" and mess with people's identities there'd be irrefutable proof of it. How much this assuages your concern depends on what you think about Certificate Transparency.