41–47 of 47 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They can be monstrous cos they can take my job which means my money and identity partially
Pet projects can take your job?
Or when everyone can build their own pet to solve their own problem?
I easily with this irrational fear thoug, there are a lot of counter argument to that apocalyptic view)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are right! Not everyone is using AI for coding. I see your point. But I also disagree with your claim saying agentic coding is nay less of care or less engineering. I have 13 years of industry experience and was doing hand coding with vim. But I adapted agentic coding which I believe is very empowering
Your comment is as empty as the prose from am LLM. I worry about the level of discourse LLMs train us to accept as normal. Assuming, of course, that this is even human-written.
These blog posts, lamenting losing something, create fascinating juxtaposition against posts from people having more fun than ever, and they’re often published on the same day. Hot take: Coding by typing sucked. Being stuck on some esoteric problem and having to rubber duck your way out of it. Your value being connected to the amount of stuff you could do that few others had the patience for, instead of how empatheti…
And I agree. The craft doesn’t disappear, it just moves from typing and debugging every detail to judgment, taste, testing, and shaping messy systems into something useful.
The ai art is atrocious - the styles are all over the place (flat cell shaded vs ghiblified vs hyperdetailed with too much text), repetition ad nauseam, varying color schemes and shapes around the same subjects (is the scaly monster pink? Green? Rainbow colored scales?), the scale is wildly inconsistent, absurd composition (the dog is going nowhere instead of the door), the ever present piss filter and just way too m…
Yes, you’re technically correct, but I believe you won’t be in a few months, or maybe a year.
I’m saying this from a point of awareness. I do know about all of those issues, but I also can’t wait until they change for good.
For instance, style consistency. Yeah, AI still can’t keep it fully consistent, but I think it will be fixed, the same way character consistency is almost fixed now. And that’s already huge progress.
There's a lot of good descriptions and observations on this article. But I don't like this language that just assumes we all use AI, we've all pulled away from the code. It all seems to be part of the collective brainwashing and psychosis that says "it's a new age now, everyone is doing it this way." > It’s less coding than it used to be, or a different kind of coding. More describing and steering and deciding, less…
You are right! Not everyone is using AI for coding. I see your point. But I also disagree with your claim saying agentic coding is nay less of care or less engineering. I have 13 years of industry experience and was doing hand coding with vim. But I adapted agentic coding which I believe is very empowering
But somehow it takes five times as many words to say that. It doesn't feel AI-written, but could this be an effect of habitual AI use, that it trains a person to write extra words to disguise what they are saying?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comment is as empty as the prose from am LLM. I worry about the level of discourse LLMs train us to accept as normal. Assuming, of course, that this is even human-written.
You see, I am jut not afraid of LLLs, or I can cope with my fear. They are just piece of technologies:)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pet projects can take your job?
Yeah, I mean, what happens when someone’s pet project grows into a giant that eats my company’s business? Or when everyone can build their own pet to solve their own problem? I easily with this irrational fear thoug, there are a lot of counter argument to that apocalyptic view)