Live data from Hacker News

AI coding is addictive. Engineers are paying the price

leaddev.com

41–42 of 42 posts

Re: AI coding is addictive. Engineers are paying the price

#41

Just started at a company and the amount of irresponsible AI use is appalling. I asked an employee whose job involves AI adoption/training how large their diffs are for pull requests. They told me that their diffs are "As much as the model can produce given its reasoning level". In the end, this is going to create unmaintainable code that no one understands. It also discourages reviewing the code because no dev can m…

If the code works, then is the technical debt a problem? AI can already write the code better than most developers, it just may not be doing so at this time because of the person prompting it. At some point, either somebody will get there hands on it who knows how to direct their AI to clean it up, or AI will get good enough on its own to simply do it.

Re: AI coding is addictive. Engineers are paying the price

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You may be wise beyond your years and are sitting on a goldmine of consulting opportunity if you can actually get tasks done faster without ai given the exact same inputs

Not really. It just is a very sucky tool, contrary to what the hype says.

Can you share what other "sucky tools" would be on the same level? I understand they do kind of suck holistically but to explain it better to laymen how would you describe the whole thing?
Post reply on HN