Earlier quoted context omitted.
I won't dismiss the human cost but boom and bust cycles have existed for a very long time. This isn't a new thing today, and it wasn't new then either. You can view these things 100% cynically, or you can also consider the possibility that markets over (and also under) shooting are also a form of discovery in which the value of new business models, technologies, etc. are determined. While I'm not personally a fan of…
> net-net it's probably better to live in economies where capital is abundant and malinvestment is possible, than to live economies where the opposite is true. This is a false dichotomy. Not everything needs to exist at the extremes. > boom and bust cycles have existed for a very long time. This isn't a new thing today, and it wasn't new then either. Murder and domestic violence have existed for a very long time. Rac…
So you think there's a way to outlaw possible malinvestment?