Live data from Hacker News

Framework's 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C's complexity

jeffgeerling.com

41–50 of 197 posts

Re: Framework's 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C's complexity

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In that case I'd rather just have one of those big usb hubs that has every port on it. Rather than an adapter designed that it only works on one laptop. Sure in theory you could plug them in to any but the design of it is such that you'd snap the connector if you plugged it in to a normal port. While a regular usb-c ethernet adapter has a flexible cable between the laptop and the bulky rigid part.

Thunderbolt hubs are rather amazing now; in the past they'd either get super hot and have reliability issues, or had severe bandwidth limitations (especially if using larger displays). The current crop has been great for my needs — a couple models have 10G Ethernet built in (CalDigit is the one I'm using now), and most now have more than one Thunderbolt port that allows a high speed storage device to be used as well…

My TB5 dock from OWC on a M4 Pro MacBook can run dual 4k 240hz displays, 2.5gb ethernet, and several peripherals no problem. It also provides 100W of power. All over a single cable. So good these days

Re: Framework's 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C's complexity

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

New chips from Realtek burn https://www.servethehome.com/cheap-10gbe-realtek-rtl8127-nic...

...and yet they're still covered by a huge heatsink.

They aren't huge at all, the new RTL cards are tiny. I wish 2-port versions were available for a home server upgrade.

Re: Framework's 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C's complexity

#43
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I looked in to it and it seemed like 10gbit was much better over fiber. Ended up deciding that 2.5gbit is plenty. The 2.5 gear is significantly cheaper and runs cool.

> I looked in to it and it seemed like 10gbit was much better over fiber. Yes, except that most devices use Ethernet. So, at the end of the day, you still need Ethernet cables unless you want to deal with an additional switch or converter in every room.

Indeed, that's largely why I decided 10gbit at home isn't really worth it. The current 10gbit ethernet stuff is expensive and power hungry, the enterprise stuff is hard to use on consumer gear. And the only real use case is super fast access to a nas.

Re: Framework's 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C's complexity

#44
post #40

Does a laptop really need more than 1Gbps or whatever you can get through WiFi? It's an edge device not a router.

Well, it's Framework we are talking about. My plan is to buy it because at some point of its lifecycle my Framework 12 motherboard will be used as a new node in my Homelab. :)

Re: Framework's 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C's complexity

#45
post #7
post #6

Every PCIe 10G ethernet card I've seen has a heatsink on it, sometimes covering the entire card or even have little fans on the heatsink. Expecting it to work full time in a laptop is a bit of a stretch of the heat dissipation budget. Also, the laptop he is working has the AMD FP8 chipset - depending on how the ports are setup, he might only get 10G USB, if the ports are allocated to video instead.

Yeah, 10Gb ethernet runs hot . I just rewired the house with 10Gb (we have 8Gb FTTP) and it's kind of upsetting how hot my Thunderbolt dock gets.

I redid everything that matters in my house/homelab with DAC cables for exactly that reason. Order of magnitude difference in watts and heat

Re: Framework's 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C's complexity

#46
post #40

Does a laptop really need more than 1Gbps or whatever you can get through WiFi? It's an edge device not a router.

Obviously not. I've got a $300 WQHD monitor that has 1GB/s over USB-C with power delivery. MacBooks have 2GB/s WiFi.

For the niche enthusiast, that dongle is fine.

Re: Framework's 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C's complexity

#47
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

4W is TDP for some of Pi-style mini computers. Lots of them have fans.

Pi 4 and 5 both idle around 3W. But a Pi 5 can pull up to 16W with a USB peripheral, full CPU load, and decoding 4k video. The Pi 4 / 5 will run OKish without a heatsink at idle wattages, but thermal throttle quickly if you attempt to do something intensive. These realtek 10gbe chips are more in the range of the Pi Zero class machines (0.5W idle, 2W loaded) which don't often come with heatsinks though they might bene…

> The Pi 4 / 5 will run OKish without a heatsink at idle wattages, but thermal throttle quickly if you attempt to do something intensive.

Even with a heatsink and fan, I had to upgrade to a higher quality set to keep Jellyfin from thermal throttling a Pi5 while transcoding 4K video.

Re: Framework's 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C's complexity

#48
post #40

Does a laptop really need more than 1Gbps or whatever you can get through WiFi? It's an edge device not a router.

Yours is an “edge device” but I am root, so mine is a portable tool for managing and testing the network that does not have working WiFi access points attached to it or obviously I would not be there.

And yes, some of those links are above 1gbps so that the users can have individual 1gbps links.

Re: Framework's 10G Ethernet module exposes USB-C's complexity

#49
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I looked in to it and it seemed like 10gbit was much better over fiber. Ended up deciding that 2.5gbit is plenty. The 2.5 gear is significantly cheaper and runs cool.

> I looked in to it and it seemed like 10gbit was much better over fiber. Yes, except that most devices use Ethernet. So, at the end of the day, you still need Ethernet cables unless you want to deal with an additional switch or converter in every room.

Fiber/10Gbase-*R is Ethernet too. Please say copper/RJ45/base-T when you mean copper/RJ45/base-T.
Post reply on HN