Live data from Hacker News

The Unsung Hero of the Lord of the Rings (2025)

theculturist.io

41–44 of 44 posts

Re: The Unsung Hero of the Lord of the Rings (2025)

#43
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm ok with him being omitted from the film, but I'm glad the novel could afford more space for someone like him, a foil to the mood of impending doom, and also just plain fun. He rescued them and equipped them, and one of the weapons he supplied played a pivotal role later. Merry would not have been successful without that blade, and Tom is a believable source for such immense help. There's a book of Tolkien's lette…

I don't disagree with him not being in the film. (Perhaps more controversially, I think the scouring of the Shire properly appropriately didn't belong there either.) Great as The Lord of the Rings is, IMO it has structural problems as books. But I don't really disagree with your comment in general.

"It is an essential part of the plot, foreseen from the outset"

Re: The Unsung Hero of the Lord of the Rings (2025)

#44
post #5

> overlooked by a huge swathe of readers I think there is no one who read LoTR and ignored Tom Bombadil. If anything, they give him too much importance.

I don't recall him having any impact on the story. The movie didn't lose anything by omitting the detour. To me it's like hedonistic gods in Buddhism--all powerful but not practically consequential to humans. I thought it was going say Samwise.

> To me it's like hedonistic gods in Buddhism--all powerful but not practically consequential to humans.

I thought Buddhist dieties are adapted Indo-Aryan / Vedic (and some post-IA) dieties which indeed have an effect on real world.

Post reply on HN