Live data from Hacker News

Confidential submission of draft S-1 to the SEC

openai.com

41–50 of 345 posts

Re: Confidential submission of draft S-1 to the SEC

#41
post #7

What's the point of a "confidential S-1"?? Isn't the S-1 supposed to inform potential investors?!? So ... shouldn't it _not_ be confidential??

Also according to the Financial Times that this confidential filling gives employees who are considering to sell shares transparency.

Re: Confidential submission of draft S-1 to the SEC

#42
post #29

I don’t get what’s the point of non-profits if you can IPO them. How does that make any sense?

See: https://www.axios.com/2023/11/18/how-openai-board-is-structu... for the OpenAI Structure. 1) In order to fund research - this stuff costs 10s of billions of dollars - everyone, from Ilya, to Elon, to Sam - all agreed that they would require a profit-arm to raise money. Nobody was going to sponsor that 10s of billions of dollars to a non-profit. 2) The non profit is still there - and controls the commercial eleme…

> Nobody was going to sponsor that 10s of billions of dollars to a non-profit

How much has MacKenzie Scott donated to non-profits again?

Seems like such a claim is on thin ice.

Re: Confidential submission of draft S-1 to the SEC

#46
post #29

I don’t get what’s the point of non-profits if you can IPO them. How does that make any sense?

See: https://www.axios.com/2023/11/18/how-openai-board-is-structu... for the OpenAI Structure. 1) In order to fund research - this stuff costs 10s of billions of dollars - everyone, from Ilya, to Elon, to Sam - all agreed that they would require a profit-arm to raise money. Nobody was going to sponsor that 10s of billions of dollars to a non-profit. 2) The non profit is still there - and controls the commercial eleme…

“Controls”

That will be especially untrue after IPO when shareholders can claim there are fiduciary responsibilities that conflict with the non profit goals.

Re: Confidential submission of draft S-1 to the SEC

#47
post #36
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They need to financially engineer a good looking quarter beforehand. Perhaps Larry Ellison can cut them a nice quid pro quo for a few months to make OpenAI look profitable (like the SpaceX/Anthropic deal), although that's probably unlikely given the debt Oracle is taking on to build it's infra.

You are forgetting the google space x deal too

[deleted]

Re: Confidential submission of draft S-1 to the SEC

#50
post #33
post #29

I don’t get what’s the point of non-profits if you can IPO them. How does that make any sense?

They're IPOing a commercial subsidiary of OpenAI so that it can donate even more money to the parent nonprofit. (Actually the subsidiary is everything and the nonprofit is a do-nothing fig leaf but the IRS and Congress seem to not care enough to stop them.)

Checks and balances dear sirs and madams, checks and balances. Excepts apparently it meant cheques used to top up account balances.
Post reply on HN