[flagged]
Unless you have access to Anthropics book your claim is as baseless as Ed Zitron's ...
Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation
41–50 of 458 posts
Re: Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Effectively infinite. Databricks is a good example. They're still private after 13 years and closed a Series L round last year. Stripe is similar. Having been through an IPO before, it was good for employee liquidity, but bad for the culture and long-term success of the company.
so how do stripe employees get liquidity? can anyone sell their secondary shares?
Private/secondary markets.
Re: Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation
#43They're going to run out of letters pretty soon.
Anyone in finance should know that excel doesn't run out of letters (for columns) either. It just rolls over to AA, AB, etc.
Re: Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation
#44Re: Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation
#45So close to being the first kilocorn. A unicorn = 1 billion, this is almost 1k.
Hasn't SpaceX achieved that though?
And Saudi Aramco before they IPO'd
Re: Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
How? OpenAI and Antrophic are basically the Big 2 racing away at light speed; the others who can't get near them are perhaps shaky & vulnerable. And sure, there's a garden full of those.
Because the market almost certainly can’t support two foundation model labs given the increasingly little difference across models and the massive sums of cash required to keep it all going. There is no big 2, just a race to survive and be the big 1.
Disagree, both are coexisting fine today.
Re: Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because the market almost certainly can’t support two foundation model labs given the increasingly little difference across models and the massive sums of cash required to keep it all going. There is no big 2, just a race to survive and be the big 1.
Disagree, both are coexisting fine today.
[deleted]
Re: Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation
#48[flagged]
I think your conclusion might be right that AGI does just feel a bunch of hype but the reasoning in middle feels flawed...
like how 13^2=169 and 31^2=961 or 10^2+11^2+12^2=13^2+14^2
Re: Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
How? OpenAI and Antrophic are basically the Big 2 racing away at light speed; the others who can't get near them are perhaps shaky & vulnerable. And sure, there's a garden full of those.
Because the market almost certainly can’t support two foundation model labs given the increasingly little difference across models and the massive sums of cash required to keep it all going. There is no big 2, just a race to survive and be the big 1.
It probably can't support any because there's no moat and smaller, open source models are catching up. This is like investing $1T into mainframe computers in 1980.
Re: Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation
#50That announcement is a bit short on details. I suppose that, like in the previous rounds, there are some strings attached and they'll not get all of it at once.
Hynix is participating with a new circular deal. Hynix is also valued at $1 trillion now, which is positively insane.
This scam will implode harder that the housing bubble.