Live data from Hacker News

FatGid: FreeBSD 14.x kernel local privilege escalation

fatgid.io

41–46 of 46 posts

Re: FatGid: FreeBSD 14.x kernel local privilege escalation

#41
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe the researcher was wearing windshield-wiper spectacles when he discovered the vulnerability. I don't understand why you're being so defensive about this.

Because it's a tiresome, tropey, and ultimately invalid complaint. Look downthread at the person who said the FreeBSD commit log was better than this page, despite being inscrutable to security practitioners who don't work in the kernel and not saying a word about proven exploit vectors. These complaints aren't about what's better or worse for the user community; they're about people trying to put vulnerability resea…

As a member of the user community, I only care when it appears on the security list and then that it's patched. And I want to see that on the changelog. And that's about it.

I don't want or need fanfare, marketing or any of that stuff.

It's a bug for fucks sake. There will be people having web pages for Gnome user interface bugs next.

Re: FatGid: FreeBSD 14.x kernel local privilege escalation

#42
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Possibly Playstation as well.

PlayStation 4 was a fork of FreeBSD 9, and is immune to this bug introduced in 14. Sony also changes a LOT, I'm not sure anything dealing with unix credentials even exists in this fork. It's not clear how much FreeBSD is even used in PlayStation 5 (2020), but it would be based off 12 or earlier (also immune to this bug from 14) (13 was released in 2021).

What about PlayStation 3?

Whilst all are "soft-moddable" via HEN, a large number of the Slim and Superslims are not compatible with full custom firmware. Recently a hardware based exploit 'badWDSD' released which allow CFW, although even still a small number of Superslims are not compatible.

Re: FatGid: FreeBSD 14.x kernel local privilege escalation

#43
post #42
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

PlayStation 4 was a fork of FreeBSD 9, and is immune to this bug introduced in 14. Sony also changes a LOT, I'm not sure anything dealing with unix credentials even exists in this fork. It's not clear how much FreeBSD is even used in PlayStation 5 (2020), but it would be based off 12 or earlier (also immune to this bug from 14) (13 was released in 2021).

What about PlayStation 3? Whilst all are "soft-moddable" via HEN, a large number of the Slim and Superslims are not compatible with full custom firmware. Recently a hardware based exploit 'badWDSD' released which allow CFW, although even still a small number of Superslims are not compatible.

I thought it went without saying that PS3 (2006) firmware isn't based on FreeBSD 14 (2023).

Re: FatGid: FreeBSD 14.x kernel local privilege escalation

#45

TrueNAS is on FreeBSD, as well as lots of network equipment. This does affect us more than we think as operators.

> This does affect us more than we think as operators.

I hope this is true but as other comments have suggested, Juniper and TrueNAS are moving or no longer on FreeBSD.

I am now wondering if Netflix may one day give up FreeBSD for their cache server as well.

Re: FatGid: FreeBSD 14.x kernel local privilege escalation

#46
post #43
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about PlayStation 3? Whilst all are "soft-moddable" via HEN, a large number of the Slim and Superslims are not compatible with full custom firmware. Recently a hardware based exploit 'badWDSD' released which allow CFW, although even still a small number of Superslims are not compatible.

I thought it went without saying that PS3 (2006) firmware isn't based on FreeBSD 14 (2023).

Thanks for clarifying (:
Post reply on HN