Interesting that they only have one rule in common with the predecessor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogme_95
Also: how many films are still produced in line with Dogma 95?
41–50 of 51 posts
Interesting that they only have one rule in common with the predecessor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogme_95
Also: how many films are still produced in line with Dogma 95?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think it's meant as a constraint to be worked around, but as a guardrail against being inauthentic. And it excludes a lot less than its inspiration Dogme 95, which has as one rule "Genre movies are not acceptable."
> "Genre movies are not acceptable." I find that hilarious, like proclaiming that only other people have an ethnicity or an accent. Because of course Dogme is a genre of its own.
Though I’d argue that rom-com, period pieces, and biopics also are “genre”, at least to the extent a particular movie just paints by numbers within those styles.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think it's meant as a constraint to be worked around, but as a guardrail against being inauthentic. And it excludes a lot less than its inspiration Dogme 95, which has as one rule "Genre movies are not acceptable."
> "Genre movies are not acceptable." I find that hilarious, like proclaiming that only other people have an ethnicity or an accent. Because of course Dogme is a genre of its own.
Interesting that they only have one rule in common with the predecessor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogme_95
And no signatures in common. Also: how many films are still produced in line with Dogma 95?
https://web.archive.org/web/20250215082603/http://www.dogme9...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And no signatures in common. Also: how many films are still produced in line with Dogma 95?
35 in total as of last year, with the most recent released in 2004 https://web.archive.org/web/20250215082603/http://www.dogme9...
I feel like they probably should have come up with a different name and just noted the connection in the manifesto