Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.3

docs.x.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 608 posts

Re: Grok 4.3

#41

Post by kuboble »

catcowcostume wrote: post #21
mythz wrote: post #6

Ok speed (202.7 tok/s) and value (1.25 -> 2.50) look great, with pretty decent intelligence.

[flagged]

I don't remember the source of the quote.

But debating whether the models are intelligent is slim to debating whether a car can walk.

You can offload to the model a lot of work that until recently we thought requires intelligence. The more and better of those tasks the model can do, it's fair to call it intelligence*

Re: Grok 4.3

#43

Post by manmal »

nextaccountic wrote: post #4
simianwords wrote: post #2

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/grok-4-3

This puts Sonnet 4.6 above Opus 4.6 in the coding index.. kinda hard to trust those numbers. (Also it puts Opus 4.7 universally above Opus 4.6, and I may be wrong but this doesn't seem to match the experience of most/many/some people. I think it's widely recognized that Anthropic is severely lacking compute and Opus 4.7 is a costs saving measure)

Anthropic themselves have (had?) this thing where Opus is used for planning and Sonnet for coding.

Re: Grok 4.3

#44

Post by vrganj »

miroljub wrote: post #31
happosai wrote: post #26

[flagged]

[flagged]

There is no non-bias. What you call unbiased is always just a reflection of your personal biases.

That being said, I am definitely against a model that is biased to be following the ideology of a far-right extremist.

Re: Grok 4.3

#45

Post by aqme28 »

nsowz wrote: post #35
tornikeo wrote: post #30

So, we have: - claude for corps and gov - codex for devs - grok for what, roleplay, racism? Those are the two things I've ever heard grok associated with around me.

Grok is as progressive as any of the other models. Despite some of the highly-publicised fuck-ups, try asking Grok anything racist and see how it replies. Yes, I know you didn't try this and you won’t.

There is a lot of daylight in between “progressive” and “openly explicitly racist”

Re: Grok 4.3

#46

Post by SanjayMehta »

nsowz wrote: post #35
tornikeo wrote: post #30

So, we have: - claude for corps and gov - codex for devs - grok for what, roleplay, racism? Those are the two things I've ever heard grok associated with around me.

Grok is as progressive as any of the other models. Despite some of the highly-publicised fuck-ups, try asking Grok anything racist and see how it replies. Yes, I know you didn't try this and you won’t.

100% agree. Grok may or may not be biased one way or the other as far as the US is concerned but from the rest of the world perspective it's mostly the same as any other model trained on Wikipedia.

Re: Grok 4.3

#48

Post by Jtarii »

miroljub wrote: post #31
happosai wrote: post #26

[flagged]

[flagged]

Musk bought a social media company for the specific purpose of getting Trump elected by turning it into a right wing propaganda machine. Have Anthropic/OpenAI/Google done something similar to that?

Re: Grok 4.3

#49

Post by walletdrainer »

artdigital wrote: post #17

Grok is my favorite model for chatting, and my favorite voice mode. It seems to be the only voice mode that isn't routing to a extremely cheap model (like Haiku), and has been the highest quality out of all the frontier ones. When you subscribe to SuperGrok you can also create a "council" of agents, each with their own system prompt and when you ask something, they will all get asked in parallel to come to a conclusi…

> No MCP / connected apps support. It's been teased but here we are, still not available. I can't connect Grok to anything, so I can't use it for serious work

Grok has tool use, no? Why would you also need MCP? What does MCP add?

Re: Grok 4.3

#50

Post by mirekrusin »

alfiedotwtf wrote: post #20
ragchronos wrote: post #9

When looking at the benchmarks, this model seems to be really close to Kimi K2.6 in terms of intelligence and pricing, hitting that sweet spot. It does also have a higher AA-Omniscience index, which is something kimi and other open models lack in. Curious to see how pleasant it is to use.

I’ll eat my hat if it even comes close to Kimi

How would you like it? Well done?
Post reply on HN