41–50 of 95 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There isn't exactly a surplus of jobs today. While some may have this option, many do not.
That argument doesn't really fly for some of the most highly paid people in the world with at least one really big name on their CVs. Everyone working at Meta has more options than almost anyone else.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
80 characters limit in the title.
Yeah, but usually folks tweak to paraphrase, instead of lopping off. I'd have gone with "Meta employees up in arms over mandatory program to train AI on their keystrokes".
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There isn't exactly a surplus of jobs today. While some may have this option, many do not.
Eh - if you have Meta on your resume it's not that tough out there right now.
> The post says the software is limited to a list of commonly used work applications, like Gmail, GChat, and Metamate, an AI assistant for employees. > It also says it only applies to computers, not to employees' phones. What a great motivator for employees to stop using their work computers.
Does anyone know how many Meta employees use a computer, and what fraction of their work they do on it? It cannot be that much, surely.
Is this like a game where we choose the next word? Meta employees are up in arms over a mandatory program to train AI on their _______ Pets? Hairstyles?
If you work for meta you shouldn't have a problem with invading the privacy of others. Of course this is not ok, but you should really quit your job if you have ethical or moral problems with that.
There isn't exactly a surplus of jobs today. While some may have this option, many do not.
People are always keen on criticizing the EU and their regulations, but employees in EU are protected from these kinds of stunts. And also from the upcoming (rumored) layoffs which won't be nearly as cruel.