Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> Immature maybe Yeah, that’s the issue. I don’t want people who behave immaturely, impulsively, or vindictively, having a key role in something as important as my phone os. I want stability, maturity, and thoughtfulness.
Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
41–50 of 343 posts
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#42Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#43> Donaldson, now 42, is a self-taught hacker who never finished school, was briefly unhoused, and spent most of his twenties in a “positive hardcore punk band.” “It’s cool being smart,” he told me. “But if you can’t pay your bills, you’re a dumbass.” > The domain “Copperhead.co” was registered by Donaldson in 2014 and incorporated in 2015 under both Donaldson’s and Micay’s names. The idea was that shares would be spl…
> They "handle the business" while someone else does 99% of the actual work, then ask to split 50/50. As a response, Micay decided to destroy the update signing keys for all the CopperheadOS devices out in the wild. Resulting in financial damages to Donaldson. Hardly a level-headed response, even if you disagree about the financial share of something.
Intelligence wanted in, and Donaldson seemingly would have been happy to oblige.
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#44[flagged]
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#45Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Immature maybe Yeah, that’s the issue. I don’t want people who behave immaturely, impulsively, or vindictively, having a key role in something as important as my phone os. I want stability, maturity, and thoughtfulness.
Mental health and wellness issues in high tech research and development are everywhere. I would suggest that you focus on the product and what it can/cannot do for you.
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#47[flagged]
Graphene is not a consumer brand and they do not intend to be a consumer brand. They do one thing: make as secure a phone OS as they can. That’s it. If you’re expecting them to do anything in a friendly way, it ain’t gonna happen, that’s not who they are or what they do. That will absolutely limit their scope and reach, but it also allows them to focus on the one thing they’re trying to do without making compromises.…
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> Immature maybe Yeah, that’s the issue. I don’t want people who behave immaturely, impulsively, or vindictively, having a key role in something as important as my phone os. I want stability, maturity, and thoughtfulness.
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
> They "handle the business" while someone else does 99% of the actual work, then ask to split 50/50. As a response, Micay decided to destroy the update signing keys for all the CopperheadOS devices out in the wild. Resulting in financial damages to Donaldson. Hardly a level-headed response, even if you disagree about the financial share of something.
[flagged]
Re: Original GrapheneOS responses to WIRED fact checker
#50[flagged]
(But, if you ignore the rants, that's a fantastic OS.)